Seattle Mariners & Seahawks Chat Forum
https://www.marinertalk.com/
As with most of these I have a problem. It is too light. Haniger good, controlled, cheap, and for those reasons would require an elite prospect and those 3 are not it.
I didn't have time look at the stats. I saw #5 pick overall and thought it might be reasonable but given those stats I would agree with you. Besides we shouldn't sell low on Mitch and unless he comes back and has a 1.000 OPS the month of July I think we should wait until the off season.Hanjag wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 6:55 pmAs with most of these I have a problem. It is too light. Haniger good, controlled, cheap, and for those reasons would require an elite prospect and those 3 are not it.
#3 is a 3rd Baseman who is 22 and can only manage a .757 OPS in A+? That does not scream headed to the all star team in 3 years.
#6 OF 19 A level but only has a .655 OPS
#10 Pitcher 19 A level 4.08 ERA
Double Mocha Man wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 7:13 pmThe article mentioned Santana and Narvaez as potential trade bait. Just chill Jerry. These are solid pieces to a rebuild. And the fans need to have someone they recognize to cheer for.
I would be willing to trade Narvaez but it would have to be for a Realmuto package. I don't think he has that value yet around the league and I am looking to get max value not .50$ on the dollar. I would be willing to listen on offers but all of the current outfielders warrant a top 100 prospect headlined package.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 7:20 pmDouble Mocha Man wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 7:13 pmThe article mentioned Santana and Narvaez as potential trade bait. Just chill Jerry. These are solid pieces to a rebuild. And the fans need to have someone they recognize to cheer for.
the guys shtick is coming up with trades, that is why the column is called a trade a day, everybody is going to be potential trade bait to him