We were 9th in points. Seems difficult to pull off with a dogshit O line...Donn Beach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 7:48 pmYeah, I meant relative to PFF that has them worst in the NFL. The concerning aspect to me was the tackles regressing. Bob talks about them taking the next step forward where PFF was they better not be as shitty as they were the second half of last season. That's the half empty, half full aspect
Seattle’s line largely rests on the development of its young tackles, Charles Cross and Abraham Lucas. While both played well early, each fell off substantially as their rookie seasons wore on. If those tackles play well, this ranking is too low. But if they don’t improve, this is a group that could struggle badly given its interior personnel
Same could be said of Woolen and Geno.....I am happy we have an all new D line.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 7:58 pmThey are not impressed with the line
Seattle’s line largely rests on the development of its young tackles, Charles Cross and Abraham Lucas. While both played well early, each fell off substantially as their rookie seasons wore on. If those tackles play well, this ranking is too low. But if they don’t improve, this is a group that could struggle badly given its interior personnel
Yeah i heard somewhere they hire homeless meth addicts off the streets to grade the plays.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 9:10 pmTrue, it's definitely a half empty sort of attitude, what does PFF know about O lines anyway
they'd be more accurate if that's what they did.Sibelius Hindemith wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:17 amYeah i heard somewhere they hire homeless meth addicts off the streets to grade the plays.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 9:10 pmTrue, it's definitely a half empty sort of attitude, what does PFF know about O lines anyway
