PFF grades thread

trharder
Posts: 2104
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 3:47 am

Re: PFF grades thread

Post by trharder » Wed Oct 01, 2025 1:28 pm

Michael K. wrote:
Tue Sep 30, 2025 3:24 pm
We average 3.6 yards per carry. At this point last year? 4.5 per carry. Yeah, what a HUGE step forward by this O Line.
The offense is still pretty shitty, only now? It also has zero chance at being explosive because we are so scared or our own shadow we won't allow it.
This is humorous, how badly we want to believe that John Schneider isn't full of shit, we look at shit like this and act like somehow someway? This O Line isn't still dogshit?
At this point, the glass is certainly 1/2 full. You can stick with your talking points, MK, and you will, but they are on
the verge of aging badly.

Michael K.
Posts: 13300
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: PFF grades thread

Post by Michael K. » Wed Oct 01, 2025 2:38 pm

trharder wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 1:28 pm
At this point, the glass is certainly 1/2 full. You can stick with your talking points, MK, and you will, but they are on
the verge of aging badly.
Why? You watched us against two divisional opponents and saw a game plan that will be sustainable? 88 yards passing in over 58 minutes of football against the Niners and THAT fourth quarter against the Cards, and you see a flaw in my criticism of the offensive philosophy? OK.

You look at a team that believes it's run first, averaging just over 3.5 per carry, and don't see a flaw? You see those O Line grades and believe that we actually were just a Zabel and Kubiak away from being the dominant run team that JS and MM told us we would be? OK.

auroraave
Posts: 2089
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 9:35 pm
Location: Beverly Hills, Ca.

Re: PFF grades thread

Post by auroraave » Wed Oct 01, 2025 2:56 pm

Michael K. wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 2:38 pm
trharder wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 1:28 pm
At this point, the glass is certainly 1/2 full. You can stick with your talking points, MK, and you will, but they are on
the verge of aging badly.
Why? You watched us against two divisional opponents and saw a game plan that will be sustainable? 88 yards passing in over 58 minutes of football against the Niners and THAT fourth quarter against the Cards, and you see a flaw in my criticism of the offensive philosophy? OK.

You look at a team that believes it's run first, averaging just over 3.5 per carry, and don't see a flaw? You see those O Line grades and believe that we actually were just a Zabel and Kubiak away from being the dominant run team that JS and MM told us we would be? OK.
Dude - you literally have Schneider Derangement Syndrome. You are embarrassing yourself at this point. I don't mean any disrespect by this - but Jesus Christ - you have some insane hate for the guy - so EVERY ONE of your posts are meant to serve that narrative - that somehow "every single thing is JS's fault". You do realize that Seattle tied for the division title last year and lost it on a technicality - right? That Geno blew at least one game that would've been the difference maker. Seattle is one of the hottest teams in the league - his drafts have been killer since he got out from under PC - he picked up the best FA QB - the team is tied for first place in the division - and yet, somehow you are pissed at John Schneider? Might be time for a reality check. Are they perfect? No. All you are doing is desperately looking for a way to push this silly narrative that "JS sucks" - it ain't working. Dying on that hill is a pretty questionable choice. This relentless hate you have for him doesn't make him look bad, it makes YOU look bad. Figure it out already. My God your posts about him are just so ridiculously toxic and so off the mark and so tone deaf to reality - because you so badly "want to be right." Good luck with that.

And please don't bother with the usual "OMG I am not allowed to criticize JS because he's your hero" nonsense - you aren't a victim of oppression here and no one idolizes him. Gross exaggerations do not make my points invalid.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 77071
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: PFF grades thread

Post by D-train » Wed Oct 01, 2025 3:21 pm

Hawks have the 2nd highest Point differential in the NFL at +44 only behind the Lions who are at +49. I hope the run game gets going and they are more aggressive on offense but that seems pretty good.
dt

Michael K.
Posts: 13300
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: PFF grades thread

Post by Michael K. » Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:09 pm

auroraave wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 2:56 pm
Michael K. wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 2:38 pm
trharder wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 1:28 pm
At this point, the glass is certainly 1/2 full. You can stick with your talking points, MK, and you will, but they are on
the verge of aging badly.
Why? You watched us against two divisional opponents and saw a game plan that will be sustainable? 88 yards passing in over 58 minutes of football against the Niners and THAT fourth quarter against the Cards, and you see a flaw in my criticism of the offensive philosophy? OK.

You look at a team that believes it's run first, averaging just over 3.5 per carry, and don't see a flaw? You see those O Line grades and believe that we actually were just a Zabel and Kubiak away from being the dominant run team that JS and MM told us we would be? OK.
Dude - you literally have Schneider Derangement Syndrome. You are embarrassing yourself at this point. I don't mean any disrespect by this - but Jesus Christ - you have some insane hate for the guy - so EVERY ONE of your posts are meant to serve that narrative - that somehow "every single thing is JS's fault". You do realize that Seattle tied for the division title last year and lost it on a technicality - right? That Geno blew at least one game that would've been the difference maker. Seattle is one of the hottest teams in the league - his drafts have been killer since he got out from under PC - he picked up the best FA QB - the team is tied for first place in the division - and yet, somehow you are pissed at John Schneider? Might be time for a reality check. Are they perfect? No. All you are doing is desperately looking for a way to push this silly narrative that "JS sucks" - it ain't working. Dying on that hill is a pretty questionable choice. This relentless hate you have for him doesn't make him look bad, it makes YOU look bad. Figure it out already. My God your posts about him are just so ridiculously toxic and so off the mark and so tone deaf to reality - because you so badly "want to be right." Good luck with that.

And please don't bother with the usual "OMG I am not allowed to criticize JS because he's your hero" nonsense - you aren't a victim of oppression here and no one idolizes him. Gross exaggerations do not make my points invalid.
Every single thing? What is my talking point besides the O Line? The fact that we still have a shitty O Line, and have damn near every season he has been here? That's not relevant discussion on a Seahawk forum?

I'm not desperately seeking shit dude, simply haven't seen any evidence that he has a clue how to build an O Line, and the way we play offense now? That aint good. Come at me with something that attacks my point for once, instead of simply attacking me and telling me everything I do that is so very wrong!

Michael K.
Posts: 13300
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: PFF grades thread

Post by Michael K. » Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:11 pm

D-train wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 3:21 pm
Hawks have the 2nd highest Point differential in the NFL at +44 only behind the Lions who are at +49. I hope the run game gets going and they are more aggressive on offense but that seems pretty good.
And with all of that? We damn near blew the last game to be .500. Blowing out a real bad team skews that some, don't you think?

They won't get more aggressive on offense, which is fine, it's there style. It's what this organization wants, which is why they hired a guy that was basically a younger version of the guy they fired.

User avatar
Donn Beach
Posts: 18071
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: PFF grades thread

Post by Donn Beach » Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:55 pm

D-train wrote:
Wed Oct 01, 2025 3:21 pm
Hawks have the 2nd highest Point differential in the NFL at +44 only behind the Lions who are at +49. I hope the run game gets going and they are more aggressive on offense but that seems pretty good.
I was thinking about the differential reading this Seaside Joe article.
Seahawks are biggest threat to overthrow the NFC
John Schneider's masterclass on flipping over a defense and an offense in 2 steps in less than 2 years
You look at what they have done the last two seasons, since Pete was canned. Remember how shitty the defense was that last season of Pete's? MM has put together what's amounting to an elite defense with many of the same players Pete had.
In the final 9 games of 2023, the Seahawks defense ranked:

29th in points allowed

32nd in rushing yards allowed

32nd in YPC allowed (5.2)

32nd in rushing TD allowed (17)

28th in passer rating allowed (97.8)

31st in completion rate allowed

Even the passer rating is generous because teams didn’t have a need to throw for touchdowns against a defense that was so soft against the run.

Macdonald inherited the worst defense in the NFL and left the best defense in the NFL for Seattle’s job, which to Schneider’s credit he was willing to wait to offer until the Ravens were eliminated in the AFC Championship game. That wait caused the Seahawks to miss out on some potential offensive coordinator hires that would have been better than Ryan Grubb, but allowed Seattle to get the most influential defensive coach in modern football.
And then the next season to turn Smith into Darnald on the offensive side, and its not just the performance, its the cap angle as well.
In 2022, the Seahawks fleeced the Broncos. In 2025, it’s not the same kind of fleecing but check this out:

Geno’s new cap hit in 2025 is $40 million

Darnold’s is $13.4 million

Geno has $18.5 million guaranteed in 2026

Darnold has $0 guaranteed in 2026

The Seahawks didn’t want any part of that and less than a month into his new job the “put in Kenny Pickett” talk isn’t from fringe Raiders fans, it’s also beat writers.
But what is maybe even more interesting is the future possibilities. Darnald is young and cheap, they are going into next season with the most cap space in the league.
Trading Geno was cited as a “terrible move” by mainstream media, some called it the sign of a full teardown by Seattle. Now they just sort of pretend like they always liked Sam Darnold, and by the way the Raiders aren’t the only team feeling the impact of the offseason QB carousel.

The Vikings either got cheap or scared, maybe letting the media boo-birds influence their decision to let Darnold leave in free agency because of his last two starts in Minnesota despite an MVP-caliber season. Yes, J.J. McCarthy was drafted to be the future but so what? You don’t go to the future, it comes to you.


The Vikings had an elite team last year with Darnold and they gifted him to the free agent market over a contract that would have paid him less money this year than T.J. Hockenson, Brian O’Neill, and Jonathan Greenard. Correct me if I’m wrong, but does this happen…ever?
Its really been pretty remarkable how JS has kept "the plates spinning" terms of a legit qb. And he's done it without investing either much money or draft capital, RS's second contract has been it

https://www.seasidejoe.com/p/seahawks-m ... am-darnold

Post Reply