Page 1 of 1
Not sure why this interested me, but if Football was a 162 game season.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2023 4:06 pm
by Michael K.
The title kind of says it all, but I found this interesting.
Re: Not sure why this interested me, but if Football was a 162 game season.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2023 4:08 pm
by Michael K.
162 seems significant, so I assume this was before this season started. Since that would be ten seasons, right?
8 times 16 games = 128
2 times 17 games = 34
Total is 162
Re: Not sure why this interested me, but if Football was a 162 game season.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2023 4:18 pm
by Donn Beach
Interesting...162 is a baseball season. So if you extended football to a single baseball season, which also is about Pete's tenure I believe, the Hawks are up 18.5 games in the NFC west
Re: Not sure why this interested me, but if Football was a 162 game season.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2023 11:27 pm
by Sibelius Hindemith
The Chiefs over the past decade are the 2001 Mariners.
Re: Not sure why this interested me, but if Football was a 162 game season.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2023 11:30 pm
by D-train
Sibelius Hindemith wrote: ↑Sat Sep 23, 2023 11:27 pm
The Chiefs over the past decade are the 2001 Mariners.
At first it shocked me they were better than the Pats but their dynasty ended several years ago.
Re: Not sure why this interested me, but if Football was a 162 game season.
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:03 pm
by 57reasons
Interesting to see that we are 3rd, not surprising, and yet we reside in the toughest division over that time (also no surprise), and it's not even close:
NFC West: +43
AFC West: +32
AFC East: +24
AFC North: +18
NFC North: even
NFC East: (4)
NFC South: (5)
AFC South: (98)
also, despite a recent reversal, bears out what we all felt about the superiority of the NFC.