Page 1 of 2
We're number #1
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2022 10:12 pm
by D-train
Not sure this is a good thing.
Re: We're number #1
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:09 pm
by Walla Walla Dawg II
That has to be bullshit dude.
If the expenses are per player then an away game would cost UW:
$103,437 x 115 = $11,895,255 per game.
Multiply that by 7 for a season (assuming bowl game)
$83,266,785
Yes, that would be 83 million dollars per season.
Now if the number of $103,437 per away game for the team, I would believe that.
Re: We're number #1
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:10 pm
by Walla Walla Dawg II
Or a clerical error for the UW with whoever calculated it.
Re: We're number #1
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2022 10:25 am
by D-train
Walla Walla Dawg II wrote: ↑Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:09 pm
That has to be bullshit dude.
If the expenses are per player then an away game would cost UW:
$103,437 x 115 = $11,895,255 per game.
Multiply that by 7 for a season (assuming bowl game)
$83,266,785
Yes, that would be 83 million dollars per season.
Now if the number of $103,437 per away game for the team, I would believe that.
It is per season.
Re: We're number #1
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2022 6:14 pm
by Captain 97
I think that's $103.437 not $103,437
Re: We're number #1
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2022 7:07 pm
by Walla Walla Dawg II
Captain 97 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 6:14 pm
I think that's $103.437 not $103,437
So that would be one hundred three dollars and four hundred thirty seven cents?
Re: We're number #1
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2022 8:57 pm
by Captain 97
Walla Walla Dawg II wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 7:07 pm
Captain 97 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 6:14 pm
I think that's $103.437 not $103,437
So that would be one hundred three dollars and four hundred thirty seven cents?
43.7 cents
Re: We're number #1
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2022 9:42 pm
by D-train
Captain 97 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 6:14 pm
I think that's $103.437 not $103,437
You might need readers. That is a comma my friend.
btw All a savvy AD would need to move up the ranks is go with a 1920s style 11 man roster. lol
Re: We're number #1
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2022 3:21 pm
by Sibelius Hindemith
UW football is doomed now. At best their future is to be a Big Ten Bitch like Northwestern, Indiana and Rutgers. And they could well end up as a "power" player in a WAC type conference instead.
Re: We're number #1
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2022 2:06 am
by ddraig
Sibelius Hindemith wrote: ↑Fri Jul 15, 2022 3:21 pm
UW football is doomed now. At best their future is to be a Big Ten Bitch like Northwestern, Indiana and Rutgers. And they could well end up as a "power" player in a WAC type conference instead.
Um, I think the UW is a better program than any of the three you mentioned. We can compete favorably with Texas, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, and are far better than Northwestern, Indiana, and Rutgers. Besides, it's likely Oregon, Cal, and Stanford use our coattails and those three ain't patsies, either.