It's Pride Month!

[bpj]

How about we keep slandering them, and we still don't need gay month...

Win-Win

I wonder how many people agree with you on this. I suspect a lot, unfortunately. And that means -- contrary to what a couple of people have said on this thread -- that being gay is no longer a non-issue. I would love to be wrong about this.

A lot agree, obviously.

All the lib cocksuckers and ladyboys can crawl back under the rocks they came out from. The world was better when they were in their closets.

Nobody cares they want to be gays. Go be gay. But when you want us to act like you deserve a month- or even a day- because of it?

Lol. Eat a dick (and don't enjoy this one...).

The age of coddling degenerates has passed. That's what got us where we are today.

[DavidGee24]

Probably wouldn't need a Gay pride month if Republicans didn't keep slandering and attacking Gays... would you?

"Republicans" = one politician and one totally random podcaster.

Funny how you preach about not marginalizing people as you lump millions of people in with what those two people said.

I agree that we should not lump millions of people together with one asshole.

On the other hand, the politician here (Miller) is the chief policy advisor to the President of the United States. Pretty important guy, and I suspect he is not just one person who is alone in his beliefs. Rather, I suspect his views are representative of thousands, if not millions of others.

That sounds reasonable, and yes it's irresponsible for someone in that position to say that. Im surprised that a bigger deal wasn't made of it.

[gil]

"Republicans" = one politician and one totally random podcaster.

Funny how you preach about not marginalizing people as you lump millions of people in with what those two people said.

I agree that we should not lump millions of people together with one asshole.

On the other hand, the politician here (Miller) is the chief policy advisor to the President of the United States. Pretty important guy, and I suspect he is not just one person who is alone in his beliefs. Rather, I suspect his views are representative of thousands, if not millions of others.

That sounds reasonable, and yes it's irresponsible for someone in that position to say that. Im surprised that a bigger deal wasn't made of it.

Agreed. Maybe we have become fatigued of being outraged by things like this from Miller. He is pretty "out there" and seems to speak his mind. (Or maybe he's just trolling.)

[DavidGee24]

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/mlb/articl ... 58036.html So they force the players to wear Pride Hats whether they want to or not (and probably most if not all of them don't), but will fine you if you write a Bible verse on them. How retarded is that?

I wonder if MLB took the initiative to go after the players (and it is against the rules to write on your hat, even if it's "Hi Mom"), or if the LGBTQ complained and issued threats, which is how they probably got their way in the first place. Needless to say, there is backlash against MLB and there should be. They literally force the players to celebrate gayness on their uniforms and have zero tolerance for any sort of protest against it. Just let them play the damn game.

[gil]

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/mlb/articl ... 58036.html So they force the players to wear Pride Hats whether they want to or not (and probably most if not all of them don't), but will fine you if you write a Bible verse on them. How retarded is that?

I wonder if MLB took the initiative to go after the players (and it is against the rules to write on your hat, even if it's "Hi Mom"), or if the LGBTQ complained and issued threats, which is how they probably got their way in the first place. Needless to say, there is backlash against MLB and there should be. They literally force the players to celebrate gayness on their uniforms and have zero tolerance for any sort of protest against it. Just let them play the damn game.

I think it's pretty silly, But it's basically marketing and branding. You (the powers that be) control uniforms and allow individual expression within proscribed limits (e.g., baseball players can wear pants down to their shoes or they can wear 3/4 pants with high socks; or NBA players can wear different sneakers).