Mariner Talk Chat Forum

Unsealed docs - Tulsi Gabbard bringing receipts! Remember all the "election denier" wackadoodles? Obama is quite literally the original election denier. Funny how the Dems always pointing the finger at others and claiming they're doing what they themselves are actually doing. But of course, anyone with half a brain already knew this. The only acceptable reaction to this should be outrage. Weaponizing our country's resources to go after someone who legitimately won the election - literally the will of the people. Obama's legacy just keeps getting worse and worse and worse. Remember - over $40 MILLION dollars of YOUR tax money went to lawyers over this stuff. This is such an embarrassment and national disgrace - doesn't matter which side of the aisle you sit on - this is wrong.

Cue wackadoodle assigned response: "OMG - BUT TRUMP"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdm7nsf ... lsiGabbard

Gabbard: "The intelligence community assessed essentially Russia doesn't have the tools, the capability, or the intent to try to change the outcome of the US presidential election."

This is inconsistent with the findings of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (2020) and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (2018).

And the Durham special counsel investigation looked into the origins of the FBI investigation, didn't it? And found nothing like what Gabbard is claiming, as I recall.

So, gil, you are still not capable of looking at the new . Both committees were fed what the FBI and CIA wanted them to see. And Durham reported what he found, which was nothing on Trump. That's all the FBI and CIA fed him.

TDS is a terrible thing to suffer, gil. And now the country, no matter which way this turns out, The Dems, Obama, and Hillary, have instigated a true Constitutional crisis worse than Watergate.

Yeah, this will surely go somewhere.

Weird how this all drops while everyone is focused on Trump potentially being a pedophile.
Congrats on electing the biggest moron in US history. God you people are fucking dumb.

Trump supporters just got proven right after years of democrat gaslighting and we're the dumb ones?

Lol.

bpj wrote: ↑

Mon Jul 21, 2025 6:39 am

Trump supporters just got proven right after years of democrat gaslighting and we're the dumb ones?

Lol.

Notice they can't even refute it? Just name calling and "don't look at that - look over here!" Also, it has nothing to do with being a Trump supporter, it's about right and wrong - it's about what is best for ALL of us. Obama's own FBI flat out said Russia had no election interference - so he made it all up - at tax payer expense - which has been proven over and over and over again - and the people that didn't buy into Obama's proven nonsense are "the dumb ones."
Meanwhile, posting some nonsensical "AI image" as a rebuttal for the damage Obama caused the country with his lies and deceit as some kind of third grade distraction is the move of an intellectual - right?
Sorry, that math ain't mathin'

gil wrote: ↑

Sun Jul 20, 2025 3:01 pm

Gabbard: "The intelligence community assessed essentially Russia doesn't have the tools, the capability, or the intent to try to change the outcome of the US presidential election."

This is inconsistent with the findings of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (2020) and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (2018).

And the Durham special counsel investigation looked into the origins of the FBI investigation, didn't it? And found nothing like what Gabbard is claiming, as I recall.

So, do you believe the document that Biden had that has 50ish signatures from different intelligence agencies that said that the Hunter Biden Laptop was Russian mis-information?

I believe that document has been debunked.... a lot like PB&J's hatred for Israel.

auroraave wrote: ↑

Mon Jul 21, 2025 12:54 pm

bpj wrote: ↑

Mon Jul 21, 2025 6:39 am

Trump supporters just got proven right after years of democrat gaslighting and we're the dumb ones?

Lol.

Notice they can't even refute it? Just name calling and "don't look at that - look over here!" Also, it has nothing to do with being a Trump supporter, it's about right and wrong - it's about what is best for ALL of us. Obama's own FBI flat out said Russia had no election interference - so he made it all up - at tax payer expense - which has been proven over and over and over again - and the people that didn't buy into Obama's proven nonsense are "the dumb ones."
Meanwhile, posting some nonsensical "AI image" as a rebuttal for the damage Obama caused the country with his lies and deceit as some kind of third grade distraction is the move of an intellectual - right?
Sorry, that math ain't mathin'

I am trying to figure out what is going on. The ICA (Intelligence Community Assessment) from 2017:

"We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments."

The FBI was obviously part of that assessment.

https://embed.documentcloud.org/documen ... ng-report/

Where is the support for your statement "Obama's own FBI flat out said Russia had no election interference"? Are there documents that contradict the ICA from 2017? Has Gabbard produced any documents?

ddraig wrote: ↑

Mon Jul 21, 2025 12:51 am

So, gil, you are still not capable of looking at the new . Both committees were fed what the FBI and CIA wanted them to see. And Durham reported what he found, which was nothing on Trump. That's all the FBI and CIA fed him.

TDS is a terrible thing to suffer, gil. And now the country, no matter which way this turns out, The Dems, Obama, and Hillary, have instigated a true Constitutional crisis worse than Watergate.

ddraig, I don't know why you say I'm not capable of looking at new stuff. But I'd like to know, what is the basis for your statement about the committees being "fed"? These were bipartisan committees, with each senator and representative having a staff including people who do research. Wouldn't people from *at least one party* want to get to the truth? Wouldn't they resist being played?

The Durham report was not about Trump, it was about the origins of the FBI probe. Isn't that true? And is Gabbard presenting any information that was not in Durham's report?

These were bipartisan committees..

according to who?