This is like the movie "Moneyball" where Billy Beane has to go over and over the exact same line "he gets on base" with his scouts because they can't grasp the concept. It is all about roster construction.bpj wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 6:51 amIt isn't about roster construction.Bil522 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:17 amGuys like Olerud, Keith Hernandez, JT Snow, and Mark Grace would all prove that you are not right. It is not about "power positions" it is about roster construction. You get power from wherever it comes a SS or a CF or a C. Team pitching and defense wins way more championships than your locked in 1920's thinking does.bpj wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:30 pmThat's where we differ.
I dont care if he hits .200 if his OPS is .850+.
The lineup needs SLG from 1B, not OBP or AVG. We don't need him on base, we need him clearing them. As a 1B, that's his job.
When your LF, RF or 1B aren't producing OPS it puts your team at an instant disadvantage (see Mariners, always) because every other team that plans to make the playoffs will have it.
The only advantage Robinson Cano gives you is if you already have good players at the positions ahead of him on the food chain.
Cano might as well have played 1B, LF or RF with the Mariners because having him at 2B didnt give us any advantage when we put Dyson (who hits like a 2B) in LF.
Cano was valuable because he was a 2B that produced OPS. But that came at a premium.
When the M's sacrificed OPS in LF, RF and 1B (where OPS comes MUCH cheaper than 2B) they were 100% squandering the single advantage Cano would have given them- an ADDITIONAL power hitter. They just skipped having one in LF or 1B to have one at 2B instead. A complete waste of the competitive advantage a power hitting 2B would be.
It would be like the worst team in baseball signing a top free agent. Shiny move, but it was still a waste.
Adding SB in LF because Cano brought the OPS at 2B was never going to help us. Ever. Ever ever. It was an idiotic concept from the beginning.
Because it is absolutely not all about "roster construction". That's a cop out like saying "lineup construction" is the answer. It means something, just not eveything.
It's about having the most, best players in your lineup. Nothing else.
John Olerud will never be an alternative to Albert Pujols just because of "roster construction". Smh. Unbelievable.
The M's won 116 games in 2001 with mostly with McLemore and Al Martin in LF and Ichiro in RF....no "power" in 2 "power" positions. Ichiro won the MVP hitting 8 home runs. Power is irrelevant, the name of the game is pitching, defense and scoring runs not bashing the ball.