Danny ONeill on the radio just now: "I was listening to the game on the radio because I don't currently have a TV"D-train wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:19 pmI don't even think you could call Danny a journalist when he wrote for the Times. He is now just a dumb sports radio buffoon.auroraave wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 7:58 pmThe bigger problem is obsessing over fantasy stats, like sacks. They are great, no question, but the batted passes, passes defensed, pressure, getting QB's out of their comfort zone, properly playing fundamental football, staying on your assignment, are all just as, if not more, important. Too much time is spent obsessing on stats while ignoring the context - simply because it's easier - and ultimately - just lazy journalism. The batted balls yesterday were huge huge huge, but since these don't make any fantasy roster points, no one cares. At last i don't think they do, I don't play that crap.
Scheming and execution. Obsessing on stats? Lame. It's what lazy journalism is all about anymore; ignore context, cut and paste a stat line instead. God forbid someone has to dig a little deeper than that.
The guy gets paid money to talk about sports and he does not have a Television set, something which was in 93% of households in.........1965. https://www.tvb.org/Portals/0/media/fil ... eholds.pdf
