ddraig wrote: ↑Mon Dec 12, 2022 3:18 am
GL_Storm wrote: ↑Sat Dec 10, 2022 8:30 pm
D-train wrote: ↑Sat Dec 10, 2022 8:07 pm
Yep even when they do ask a provocative question like Stone did about moving JP from SS for a FA, they just let them answer with a canned BS response instead of following up with the obvious, "Don't ya think that kind of puts you at a disadvantage in a highly competitive process to convince players to join your team?????"
It's not just the question and answer, it's the total lack of inside information. There's just nothing from these guys. Not a damn thing.
Just started reading this thread and what I find intriguing is that we here on the forum have more inside information that the supposed, professional, beat reporters. Sometimes you want to slap your forehead and say, "Gee, we thought of that a few months ago!"
Beat reporters may have more information than they're sharing with their audiences.
Or not.
Front offices (and public figures) may share information with a beat reporter with the understanding that the information remain private for the time being. The beat reporter may decline in advance to make that agreement.
Beat reporters are dependent on their sources. Thirty years ago that source may have needed the beat reporter almost as much as the beat reporter needed the source. That's changed as the source can use social media to go directly to the audience, bypassing the filter of the beat reporter. As a result the public figure has a tighter grip on the message reaching (or not reaching) the public.
It's the change in information economics.
harmony
former newspaper reporter and editor
former UW* journalism professor
* OK, OK ... not the Seattle UW but the Cowboy UW
)