Would Trout have much say in a trade? Methinks not.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2024 4:03 amI don't think Trout would embrace it, so far Trout hasn't shown an inclination to leave LA. And if he did decide he wanted to it wouldn't be Seattle, it be the east coast. Phillies being the dream fit but even that seems pretty doubt.
While it has always been wishful thinking and a long shot at best, the dream of seeing Mike Trout in a Philadelphia Phillies uniform is finally dead, at least according to one MLB insider. Trout never wanted to leave the Los Angeles Angels; his recent knee injury and surgery may have ultimately secured that fate.
Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic recently laid out the case for why Trout will be stuck in Anaheim forever (subscription required). He even mentions the Phillies as a fit for the generational talent, if he were to change course and leverage his way to a new team.
We have this apparently talent rich farm system. We have the pieces to pull off a trade. The Angels would be fools not to do it. The question is whether they would, and whether we would.
2030 is a long way off, so would it be worth it to acquire a super star whose luminosity is dimming?