World Series Thread

User avatar
desbcoach
Posts: 4857
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:49 am

Re: World Series Thread

Post by desbcoach » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:14 am

Pretty sad to see such shitty home plate umpire with his crappy balls and strike calls. Changed the out come of this game 3 IMO

User avatar
Bil522
Posts: 2619
Joined: Fri May 03, 2019 12:52 am

Re: World Series Thread

Post by Bil522 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:22 am

DavidGee24 wrote:
Mon Oct 27, 2025 7:33 pm
Bil522 wrote:
Sun Oct 26, 2025 8:48 pm
D-train wrote:
Sun Oct 26, 2025 5:28 pm
I can't even think of the weapon to beat the shit eating grin off of his face. I bet John Stanton pays him to fuck his old hag wife. So gross.
But how do you really feel about Bradford?
An even better question is who is the Mariner equivalent of Bradford, although that's an easy one: Dylan Moore.
That is unfair, Dilly has had good games for the M's over the years...has Bradford had a good game for the Seahawks yet?

User avatar
Bil522
Posts: 2619
Joined: Fri May 03, 2019 12:52 am

Re: World Series Thread

Post by Bil522 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:50 am

Will Klein was traded by the M's to the Dodgers on June 2, 2025

Michael K.
Posts: 13462
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: World Series Thread

Post by Michael K. » Tue Oct 28, 2025 7:34 am

bpj wrote:
Tue Oct 28, 2025 3:53 am
Turned on game 3 after the 6th inning tonight. What a game..
Amazing game!

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 14961
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: World Series Thread

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Tue Oct 28, 2025 11:39 am

To me, playing an additional 9 inning game was stupid and unnecessary. It doesn't make it a great game just a long and tortuous one. That's how i felt about the extra inning game against Houston 3 years ago.

bhofferb
Posts: 386
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 3:35 pm

Re: World Series Thread

Post by bhofferb » Tue Oct 28, 2025 3:47 pm

Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Tue Oct 28, 2025 11:39 am
To me, playing an additional 9 inning game was stupid and unnecessary. It doesn't make it a great game just a long and tortuous one. That's how i felt about the extra inning game against Houston 3 years ago.
Sadly, a game like this will probably make MLB decide to use the ghost runner in the playoffs, which is a stupid idea

Michael K.
Posts: 13462
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: World Series Thread

Post by Michael K. » Tue Oct 28, 2025 3:49 pm

bhofferb wrote:
Tue Oct 28, 2025 3:47 pm
Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Tue Oct 28, 2025 11:39 am
To me, playing an additional 9 inning game was stupid and unnecessary. It doesn't make it a great game just a long and tortuous one. That's how i felt about the extra inning game against Houston 3 years ago.
Sadly, a game like this will probably make MLB decide to use the ghost runner in the playoffs, which is a stupid idea
I've never understood how this makes the game end sooner? It's not like only one team gets a chance to score the runner from second. The only way this is an advantage is if the visiting team doesn't score. Then you can easily bunt the runner over and try to win it with a fly ball. But how does giving both teams a runner at second base ensure that the game will end sooner?

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 14961
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: World Series Thread

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Tue Oct 28, 2025 3:52 pm

Playing 18 innings is a stupid idea. Can you imagine staying up until 2:15 in the morning just to see your team lose after enduring 8.5 additional scoreless innings? That would turn me off baseball for life.

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 14961
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: World Series Thread

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Tue Oct 28, 2025 3:54 pm

Basically those last 9 innings was like watching two Mariner teams playing against each other with every player hacking away hoping to get lucky and hit one out.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 77370
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: World Series Thread

Post by D-train » Tue Oct 28, 2025 3:54 pm

Michael K. wrote:
Tue Oct 28, 2025 3:49 pm
bhofferb wrote:
Tue Oct 28, 2025 3:47 pm
Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Tue Oct 28, 2025 11:39 am
To me, playing an additional 9 inning game was stupid and unnecessary. It doesn't make it a great game just a long and tortuous one. That's how i felt about the extra inning game against Houston 3 years ago.
Sadly, a game like this will probably make MLB decide to use the ghost runner in the playoffs, which is a stupid idea
I've never understood how this makes the game end sooner? It's not like only one team gets a chance to score the runner from second. The only way this is an advantage is if the visiting team doesn't score. Then you can easily bunt the runner over and try to win it with a fly ball. But how does giving both teams a runner at second base ensure that the game will end sooner?
Because it dramatically increases the chances of scoring at least one run every inning.
Before the "ghost runner" rule, extra-inning MLB games averaged about 11.3 innings, while after the rule was implemented (in 2020), the average length decreased to around 10.3 innings. The ghost runner rule, which places a runner on second base to start each extra inning, was designed to increase scoring and shorten games, and data shows it has been successful in reducing the average number of innings played.
Before the ghost runner rule (pre-2020)
Average innings: Approximately 11.3 innings.
Average game time: While a precise average isn't consistently available across studies, games went longer, with some studies indicating an average of 11.3 innings, which is one inning longer than after the rule was implemented.
Longer games: A significant percentage of extra-inning games (around 19% in 2019) lasted 13 or more innings, a number that dropped dramatically after the rule was introduced.
dt

Post Reply