harmony wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2026 4:28 pm
The front office, especially those on the business side, see great value in a forum such as this one despite its overwhelming negative sentiments.
Business people grow concern when no one is talking about their product. An analogy is found in the old adage "Bad publicity is better than no publicity."
The concept is discussed in this free online course
Value Co-Creation in Sports Mangement:
https://www.edx.org/learn/sports-busine ... ng-society
Good to see you, harmony - it's been a minute.
I get the point about engagement and “bad publicity,” but that’s not really addressing what I’m saying.
The front office clearly cares about the bottom line. No argument there. What they don’t appear committed to is winning ... and by extension, the kind of sustained fan satisfaction that comes from fielding a competitive roster instead of scavenging for the cheapest available parts.
There’s a big difference between valuing discussion about the product and actually investing in making the product better. One keeps the conversation (and the revenue) going. The other costs money and risks the comfortable status quo of mediocrity that still sells enough tickets and merch.
Other franchises seem willing to eat some short-term profit to chase real contention. This one looks content to keep the lights on with dumpster-dive talent and bank on the fact that enough of us will stick around anyway.