Death rate for the WuHuFlu

[Coeurd’Alene J]

Funniest covid terms I've come across lately:

The Shanghai Shivers

The Szechwan Sniffles

Lol

Gonna use those

[HawkBowler 2.0]

My favorite is Kungflu.

In Europe they're talking about Covid being a seasonal thing that's with us forever. I think it's the socialists who believe they will be with us forever.

[D-train]

Hypocrat party just keeps outdoing itself in CA.

https://twitter.com/BrandiKruse/status/ ... 0506469377

[bpj]

.

[Coeurd’Alene J]

Evidently the testing of the wuflu is suspect


https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/first ... cycle-data

Numerous epidemiological experts have argued that cycle thresholds are an important metric by which patients, the public, and policymakers can make more informed decisions about how infectious and/or sick an individual with a positive COVID-19 test might be. However, as JustTheNews reports, health departments across the country are failing to collect that data.

Here are a few headlines from those experts and scientific studies:

1. Experts compiled three datasets with officials from the states of Massachusetts, New York and Nevada that conclude:“Up to 90% of the people who tested positive did not carry a virus."

2. The Wadworth Center, a New York State laboratory, analyzed the results of its July tests at the request of the NYT: 794 positive tests with a Ct of 40: “With a Ct threshold of 35, approximately half of these PCR tests would no longer be considered positive,” said the NYT. “And about 70% would no longer be considered positive with a Ct of 30! “

3. An appeals court in Portugal has ruled that the PCR process is not a reliable test for Sars-Cov-2, and therefore any enforced quarantine based on those test results is unlawful.

4. A new study from the Infectious Diseases Society of America, found that at 25 cycles of amplification, 70% of PCR test "positives" are not "cases" since the virus cannot be cultured, it's dead. And by 35: 97% of the positives are non-clinical.

5. PCR is not testing for disease, it's testing for a specific RNA pattern and this is the key pivot. When you crank it up to 25, 70% of the positive results are not really "positives" in any clinical sense, since it cannot make you or anyone else sick

So, in summary, with regard to our current "casedemic", positive tests as they are counted today do not indicate a “case” of anything. They indicate that viral RNA was found in a nasal swab. It may be enough to make you sick, but according to the New York Times and their experts, probably won’t. And certainly not sufficient replication of the virus to make anyone else sick. But you will be sent home for ten days anyway, even if you never have a sniffle. And this is the number the media breathlessly reports... and is used to fearmonger mask mandates and lockdowns nationwide...

[bpj]

17% seems way low.

Actually, now that I think about it, 4 out of 19 people that participated in the forum "Who will won the election?" poll thought Biden would win the election, thats 21%

A couple of those guys claim not to be liberals, so if we took 3/19 that's 16%.

I guess if you split the uprights, 17% sounds about right.

[Coeurd’Alene J]

17% seems way low.

Actually, now that I think about it, 4 out of 19 people that participated in the forum "Who will won the election?" poll thought Biden would win the election, thats 21%

A couple of those guys claim not to be liberals, so if we took 3/19 that's 16%.

I guess if you split the uprights, 17% sounds about right.

Just Love Scott Adams

[D-train]

Check out my response to this chick who tweet the 7,958th "Cancel the season" tweet that I have seen this year. Click on her profile pick and it will all make sense. lol

https://twitter.com/TheBarrilla/status/ ... 8069903363

[seattlefan-daBronx]

Check out my response to this chick who tweet the 7,958th "Cancel the season" tweet that I have seen this year. Click on her profile pick and it will all make sense. lol

https://twitter.com/TheBarrilla/status/ ... 8069903363

[bpj]

.