Moores bat has been fine for a LF but I don't know why they'd intentionally add that pressure to him when he could be a + 2B and LF options were easily had.D-train wrote: ↑Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:06 pmYep, I guess they were going to go with Moore in LF until JK comes up and then back to UT despite the fact he has one, if not the best bats on the team.bpj wrote: ↑Fri Feb 19, 2021 3:48 amDipoto hates Dylan Moore. So stupid.Sexymarinersfan wrote: ↑Fri Feb 19, 2021 3:42 amSounds like Dipoto offered Kolten Wong and Tommy LaStella multi-year contracts. They opted for the Brewers and the Giants. That would've awesome had we scored either player. Dipoto says now we're just gonna go with what we have in house. Marmolejos/Haggerty/Fraley it is.
http://sports.mynorthwest.com/1311873/m ... es-paxton/?
Also saw this little tidbit....
Especially on a multi year contract for a blah 2B? I don't get it.
I do get wanting to have Moore be the UTIL given he can perform well and replace the production just about anywhere on the field.
I just think he deserves and has earned better, the starting 2B spot.
In other words, why make your UTIL player better than one of your starters? Just start the good player at the highest defensive rung on the ladder he's capable of.
Being a 2B capable of an .800 OPS is much more scarce than a 3B with an .800 OPS.