https://youtu.be/rnIPw_Who7E Exhibit "A" of VP Joe Biden extorting the Ukrainian president with OUR money.
Odd how the media [as well as SNOPES] says this is a "debunked conspiracy theory", when Joe Biden openly brags about commiting the quid pro quo
I am amazed that Globalist controlled You Tube hasn't taken this video down yet. They must know that it's already too late to hide the truth...?
JANUARY 22, 2020
Biden campaign issues warning to the media: Fall in line and debunk corruption claims
It is 'malpractice' not to debunk the claims
Phil Shiver
On Monday, Joe Biden's presidential campaign issued a warning to reporters and editors in a circulated memorandum demanding that they debunk claims of corruption against him.
The memo, titled, "The Imperative for Honest Coverage of Trump's Ukraine Conspiracy Theory," dealt specifically with the charge that then-Vice President Biden, as the Obama administration's point man in Ukraine, pushed for a Ukrainian prosecutor to be fired by threatening to withhold aid to the country.
The fired prosecutor, Victor Shokin, was reportedly removed at the same time he was investigating Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company where Biden's son, Hunter, sat on the board.
It is 'malpractice' not to debunk the claims
According to the Biden campaign, President Trump's impeachment was due in large part to his efforts to spread this theory.
"[Trump's] objective was to pressure the Ukrainian government into spreading a malicious and conclusively debunked conspiracy theory: that Vice President Biden engaged in wrongdoing when he executed official United States policy to remove a corrupt prosecutor from office," communications director Kate Bedingfield wrote in the memo.
In the memo, Bedingfield cites numerous mainstream news outlets that agree with Biden's version of the story and that discredit the theory that Biden pushed for the firing of the prosecutor to cover up corruption.
Accordingly, she goes on to instruct the media to "state clearly and unambiguously that [such claims of corruption] have been discredited and debunked" during their ongoing impeachment coverage.
To do otherwise would be journalistic "malpractice," she warns.
"It is not sufficient to say the allegations are 'unsubstantiated' or that 'no evidence has emerged to support them.' Not only is there 'no evidence' for Republicans' main argument against the Vice President — there is a mountain of evidence that actively debunks it. And it is malpractice to ignore that truth."
Reporting on the news, The Hill called the Biden campaign memo the "strongest rebuke yet" of corruption allegations against the candidate.
The media falls in line
Despite numerous outlets having reported the claims as false, Republicans and Trump defenders are not so convinced.
In fact, it was Biden himself who added fuel to the theory's flame when he openly bragged on camera about successfully securing Shokin's firing during a meeting with the Council on Foreign Relations in 2018.
"I said, 'I'm telling you, you're not getting the billion dollars.' I said, 'you're not getting the billion.' I'm going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: 'I'm leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money.'" Biden recalled.
"Well, son of a bitch," he continued to laughter. "He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time."
But, HotAir reported that following the memo's release, already some in the media have agreed to the campaign's imperative.
MSNBC's Heidi Przybla said on air that the campaign's warning is "a preemptive strike against the disinformation that is really at the heart of the president's defense."
"This is a reminder ... that the entire premise of the [president's] argument is debunked. It is not just unsubstantiated," she continued, repeating the talking points.
Comments.....
"Someone who was solid"
Translation : someone who would close the investigation into Burisma and thus let my son off the hook.
None of the mainstream news outlets has ever played this on their broadcast. Why?
Thank you Joe for convicting yourself! Quid Pro Quo at it's finest!!! Your are corrupt!!!
Dang I thought this was supposed to be fake? Looks pretty real to me
Keep sharing, they're [You Tube] taking/hiding this video.
Thank you for posting! I hope this doesn't get taken down.
So your strategy is to blame and impeach your opponent for exactly what you did and pretend it never happened? Brilliant! When will people ever wake up?
Biden admitted to extortion. Clearly.
I think that they call this "Quid Pro Quo", but I guess it's alright as long as it is not
a Republican doing it. And how about Obama's witholding Congressional funds for
Ukraine's military during his whole administration's time in office.
Simply incredible. From the horse's mouth--here's Biden (and Obama, apparently) doing precisely what the dems have falsely accused Trump of doing. How long before YouTube restricts this video, I wonder.
Impeachment
-
Coeurd’Alene J
- Posts: 5785
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 2:56 am
Re: Impeachment
An article on what congress should be investigating
[/http://meaninginhistory.blogspot.com/
What we really need is for Congress to take a sober and unflinching review of Obama's Spygate, in which an American president used the FBI to spy on a political opponent. To get that power, the FBI lied 17 times to a federal judge. Not only that, but the FBI tried to entrap Donald John Trump's son and his son-in-law at Trump Tower in June 2016. Not only that but when Devin Nunes later informed the judge the FBI lied, she ignored it.
This is the constitutional crisis we need to address because if we fail to put in place strict penalties for using the FBI to spy, the next Democrat president will do even worse.
[/http://meaninginhistory.blogspot.com/
Re: Impeachment
"I do not talk to FBI Directors about pending investigations.
We have a strict line, and always have maintained it. I guarantee it."
- Barrack Hussein (April 10, 2016, FOX News interview with Chris Wallace)
"POTUS wants to know everything we are doing."
- Peter Strzok (September 2, 2016)
Some great reactions to more of the same Yahoo News Anti Trump Propaganda:
Did Schiff show his hard concrete evidence of collusion yet?
Shouldn’t democrats finally release the Russia collusion evidence that they promised before they fabricated another phony crime?
Trump's Defense revealed that ALL of the subpoenas issued by the House were invalid, as they had Failed to follow proper procedure to start the impeachment inquiry. The procedure REQUIRES a vote by the ENTIRE House, and could NOT be started by just the Speaker of the House's say so.
Nancy doesn't have that power, so there goes Article #2 Obstruction of Congress, down the drain, LOL
The brilliant founders of this country anticipated the possibility of mob rule in the House by mandating a two-thirds vote in the Senate to convict. Thank heavens for their foresight
We have a strict line, and always have maintained it. I guarantee it."
- Barrack Hussein (April 10, 2016, FOX News interview with Chris Wallace)
"POTUS wants to know everything we are doing."
- Peter Strzok (September 2, 2016)
Some great reactions to more of the same Yahoo News Anti Trump Propaganda:
Did Schiff show his hard concrete evidence of collusion yet?
Shouldn’t democrats finally release the Russia collusion evidence that they promised before they fabricated another phony crime?
Trump's Defense revealed that ALL of the subpoenas issued by the House were invalid, as they had Failed to follow proper procedure to start the impeachment inquiry. The procedure REQUIRES a vote by the ENTIRE House, and could NOT be started by just the Speaker of the House's say so.
Nancy doesn't have that power, so there goes Article #2 Obstruction of Congress, down the drain, LOL
The brilliant founders of this country anticipated the possibility of mob rule in the House by mandating a two-thirds vote in the Senate to convict. Thank heavens for their foresight
Re: Impeachment
1. Zelensky said he wasn't pressured. Who are we going to believe, the man Trump was actually talking to or serial liar Adam Schiff?.
2. No one in the Ukraine even knew the aid had been delayed, so you CANNOT have a quid pro quo without a quo.
3. Ukraine had already gotten javelin missiles from US, and Trump did release the aid which was more aid than Obama ever even thought about giving the Ukraine.
4. Biden IS on video tape bragging about his own quid pro quo.
5. Ukraine is known to have been full of corruption. Trump DID act in our best interests to inquire about the Bidens activities. If it also benefits Trump to reveal the truth about the Bidens ..so what..?
2. No one in the Ukraine even knew the aid had been delayed, so you CANNOT have a quid pro quo without a quo.
3. Ukraine had already gotten javelin missiles from US, and Trump did release the aid which was more aid than Obama ever even thought about giving the Ukraine.
4. Biden IS on video tape bragging about his own quid pro quo.
5. Ukraine is known to have been full of corruption. Trump DID act in our best interests to inquire about the Bidens activities. If it also benefits Trump to reveal the truth about the Bidens ..so what..?
Re: Impeachment
It's over.
Anybody that cant see the Democrat/media collusion at this point is flat out stupid.
There was never a case, but they tried nonstop to make a mountain out of a mole hill.
Stupid libs.
Anybody that cant see the Democrat/media collusion at this point is flat out stupid.
There was never a case, but they tried nonstop to make a mountain out of a mole hill.
Stupid libs.
Re: Impeachment
It was over before it began. Odds of flipping 20 Repubs was always negative infinity. Epic waste of time and money by the Sanctimonious Hypocrite Party.
dt
Re: Impeachment
Libtards on facebook are messaging each other right now saying that this is "FAKE NEWS" and if they see it posted be sure to report this to facebook admin......
When Facebook last fall said it would delete “any and all mentions” of the name of the CIA operative believed to be the "whistleblower” who sparked President Trump's impeachment, it wasn’t kidding.
A number of Facebook members complain the social media giant has been taking down recent RealClearInvestigations stories about the whistleblower within hours of sharing them with friends.
"I posted your article to Facebook, got a bunch of likes and comments and shares,” said a user in Sacramento who linked to RCI’s Jan. 22 story, “Whistleblower Was Overheard in ’17 Discussing With Ally How to Remove Trump.” “But when I looked to see if there were additional responses, I saw that Facebook had removed the post. Wow! The story disappeared overnight, no message to me.”
She said she tried reposting the story twice, but Facebook’s content police removed it both times within an hour or so.
Another user in New Orleans also complained: “The article disappeared from my ‘friends' feed.” And a Little Rock member reported, “My post was removed without any notification from Facebook.”
Facebook had no comment. But in early November -- a week after RCI first reported Oct. 30 that CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella’s name had been invoked in heated discussions about the whistleblower during closed-door House depositions of impeachment witnesses — the site warned it would scrub from its platform identifying posts on the whistleblower. It explained that outing the anonymous official violates its policy against potentially "coordinating harm” against witnesses or activists. Facebook users complain RCI's original story, "The Beltway's 'Whistleblower' Furor Obsesses Over One Name,” which quickly went viral after the Drudge Report linked to it, has also been wiped off their pages.
A Connecticut law school student was so incensed after Facebook deleted his whistleblower posts mentioning Ciaramella — again, without warning, notification or explanation — that he sued Facebook and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg for allegedly violating fair trade practices, as well as his civil liberties. "The plaintiff has been denied the ability to speak publicly on a matter of grave public importance,” Cameron Atkinson’s attorneys stated in his Nov. 12 complaint.
Atkinson argued that Facebook’s “censorship” of the whistleblower is “politically motivated” to preserve “the carefully crafted narrative around the attempt to impeach President Trump.”
During the 2016 election, the social network was accused of suppressing right-leaning publications and authors, along with positive Trump stories, in its "Trending Topics” news feature. FEC records show Facebook executives overwhelmingly back Democrats, including COO Sheryl Sandberg who made a $416,000 contribution to Hillary Clinton in 2016. So do Facebook employees: 87% of their political contributions have gone to Democrats since the company was founded in 2004, according to a 2018 study.
Many of Facebook’s 2.3 billion users rely on the platform for their political news. Others rely on traditional media, but they won’t hear about the whistleblower there, either.
CIA snitch Eric Ciaramella filed a whistleblower complaint on August 12 over President Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky where the two discussed ferreting out corruption. This included talk about the Biden crime family.
** The so-called “whistleblower” Eric Ciarmella is a Democrat who had a “professional” tie to a 2020 Democrat.
** Ciaramella coordinated and took guidance from Adam Schiff’s staff and Schiff lied about it.
** Schiff’s staff recommended attorneys for the so called “whistleblower.”
** Ciaramella was kicked out of the White House for leaking negative stories about Donald Trump in 2017.
** Trump-hater Ciaramella was behind the fake story that Putin told Trump to fire Comey — a COMPLETE FAKE NEWS STORY from 2017!
** Ciaramella’s attorneys worked for James Clapper, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, and donated to Joe Biden.
** The attorney for Ciaramella is a member of the #Resistance.
** Ciaramella worked with Joe Biden in the executive branch when he was Vice President.
** Ciaramella traveled with Joe Biden to the Ukraine.
** Ciaramella worked with DNC operative Alexandra Chalupa in the creation of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax.
** A former associate of James Clapper, Charles McCullough, assisted Ciaramella with his complaint against Trump.
** And Adam Schiff’s aides, Abigail Grace and Sean Misko worked with Ciaramella in the White House.
Abigail Grace, who worked at the NSC until 2018, was hired by Schiff in February.
Sean Misko, an NSC aide until 2017, joined Schiff’s committee staff in August, the same month the whistleblower submitted his complaint.
And Schiff kept this a secret from Republicans while he was working with Eric Ciaramella before he filed his complaint in August.
The same conservative groups who came together to file an ethics complaint against Nancy Pelosi should do one against the two former NSA staffers who are now working for Rep. Adam Schiff in his office on the sham impeachment hearings.
Abigail Grace and Sean Misko are alleged to have coordinated with Eric Ciamarella to manipulate the rules on here-say and help create the fraudulent whistleblower complaint.
Eric Ciamarella is also alleged to be the conduit to leak the phone call information from whistleblower Number 2 Alexander Vindman who testified in the secret basement star chamber on Tuesday.
It is apparent already that this was an attempted coup of the US president.
Wait until the American public find out how much they have been lied to!
Author: Jim Hoft
Source: The Gateway Pundit: MUST READ: The Complete List of DNC “Whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella’s Ties to Top Democrats WILL SHOCK YOU!
NO Q REPORT
This has been said before but it’s worth repeating. In fact, it’s worth beating this drum again and again until the truth is shared with as many Americans as possible. Alleged Ukraine whistleblower Eric Ciaramella is being distanced from the impeachment inquiry for one reason and one reason only: He’s a manufactured whistleblower who may be the only person in Washington DC with less credibility than Adam Schiff.
The CIA operative’s ties to major Democrats and anti-Trump members of the intelligence community are so thick, it’s no wonder they were adamant about his identity remaining hidden. This wasn’t just standard whistleblower protection. This was narrative protection first and foremost. If Americans knew the whistleblower had been fired from National Security Council for leaking sensitive information from the White House, the people would have been skeptical. If they also learned he worked for Joe Biden and traveled with him to Ukraine, the people would understand why he was filing the complaint.
But it gets worse. It turns out his connections to taking down President Trump date back to before the 2016 election. He worked with Alexandra Chalupa, who Glenn Beck exposed as directly contributing to the Russian-collusion hoax, among other things. Then, there’s the false report that Vladimir Putin ordered President Trump to fire James Comey. Yep, that whopper came from our guy Ciaramella.
The list goes on and on, from direct ties to current Schiff staffers who worked with him a the NSC to coordination with people like Susan Rice, James Clapper, and John Brennan. And yet, mainstream media won’t even mention his name. This is why we need patriots to help us get the word out.
This is all information Democrats are desperate to keep from the American people. The very premise behind this whole impeachment debacle is so manufactured, so corrupt, it makes the Clinton Foundation seem like a saintly organization. This is why Democrats are desperate to keep Ciaramella as far away from the impeachment inquiry as possible despite demanding that he testify secretly before his identity was revealed.
This video by IPOT (In Pursuit Of Truth) breaks down most of the shady dealings surrounding alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella. He’s not a conscientious citizen blowing the whistle. He’s a partisan hack doing the bidding of the “Deep State.”
When Facebook last fall said it would delete “any and all mentions” of the name of the CIA operative believed to be the "whistleblower” who sparked President Trump's impeachment, it wasn’t kidding.
A number of Facebook members complain the social media giant has been taking down recent RealClearInvestigations stories about the whistleblower within hours of sharing them with friends.
"I posted your article to Facebook, got a bunch of likes and comments and shares,” said a user in Sacramento who linked to RCI’s Jan. 22 story, “Whistleblower Was Overheard in ’17 Discussing With Ally How to Remove Trump.” “But when I looked to see if there were additional responses, I saw that Facebook had removed the post. Wow! The story disappeared overnight, no message to me.”
She said she tried reposting the story twice, but Facebook’s content police removed it both times within an hour or so.
Another user in New Orleans also complained: “The article disappeared from my ‘friends' feed.” And a Little Rock member reported, “My post was removed without any notification from Facebook.”
Facebook had no comment. But in early November -- a week after RCI first reported Oct. 30 that CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella’s name had been invoked in heated discussions about the whistleblower during closed-door House depositions of impeachment witnesses — the site warned it would scrub from its platform identifying posts on the whistleblower. It explained that outing the anonymous official violates its policy against potentially "coordinating harm” against witnesses or activists. Facebook users complain RCI's original story, "The Beltway's 'Whistleblower' Furor Obsesses Over One Name,” which quickly went viral after the Drudge Report linked to it, has also been wiped off their pages.
A Connecticut law school student was so incensed after Facebook deleted his whistleblower posts mentioning Ciaramella — again, without warning, notification or explanation — that he sued Facebook and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg for allegedly violating fair trade practices, as well as his civil liberties. "The plaintiff has been denied the ability to speak publicly on a matter of grave public importance,” Cameron Atkinson’s attorneys stated in his Nov. 12 complaint.
Atkinson argued that Facebook’s “censorship” of the whistleblower is “politically motivated” to preserve “the carefully crafted narrative around the attempt to impeach President Trump.”
During the 2016 election, the social network was accused of suppressing right-leaning publications and authors, along with positive Trump stories, in its "Trending Topics” news feature. FEC records show Facebook executives overwhelmingly back Democrats, including COO Sheryl Sandberg who made a $416,000 contribution to Hillary Clinton in 2016. So do Facebook employees: 87% of their political contributions have gone to Democrats since the company was founded in 2004, according to a 2018 study.
Many of Facebook’s 2.3 billion users rely on the platform for their political news. Others rely on traditional media, but they won’t hear about the whistleblower there, either.
CIA snitch Eric Ciaramella filed a whistleblower complaint on August 12 over President Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky where the two discussed ferreting out corruption. This included talk about the Biden crime family.
** The so-called “whistleblower” Eric Ciarmella is a Democrat who had a “professional” tie to a 2020 Democrat.
** Ciaramella coordinated and took guidance from Adam Schiff’s staff and Schiff lied about it.
** Schiff’s staff recommended attorneys for the so called “whistleblower.”
** Ciaramella was kicked out of the White House for leaking negative stories about Donald Trump in 2017.
** Trump-hater Ciaramella was behind the fake story that Putin told Trump to fire Comey — a COMPLETE FAKE NEWS STORY from 2017!
** Ciaramella’s attorneys worked for James Clapper, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, and donated to Joe Biden.
** The attorney for Ciaramella is a member of the #Resistance.
** Ciaramella worked with Joe Biden in the executive branch when he was Vice President.
** Ciaramella traveled with Joe Biden to the Ukraine.
** Ciaramella worked with DNC operative Alexandra Chalupa in the creation of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax.
** A former associate of James Clapper, Charles McCullough, assisted Ciaramella with his complaint against Trump.
** And Adam Schiff’s aides, Abigail Grace and Sean Misko worked with Ciaramella in the White House.
Abigail Grace, who worked at the NSC until 2018, was hired by Schiff in February.
Sean Misko, an NSC aide until 2017, joined Schiff’s committee staff in August, the same month the whistleblower submitted his complaint.
And Schiff kept this a secret from Republicans while he was working with Eric Ciaramella before he filed his complaint in August.
The same conservative groups who came together to file an ethics complaint against Nancy Pelosi should do one against the two former NSA staffers who are now working for Rep. Adam Schiff in his office on the sham impeachment hearings.
Abigail Grace and Sean Misko are alleged to have coordinated with Eric Ciamarella to manipulate the rules on here-say and help create the fraudulent whistleblower complaint.
Eric Ciamarella is also alleged to be the conduit to leak the phone call information from whistleblower Number 2 Alexander Vindman who testified in the secret basement star chamber on Tuesday.
It is apparent already that this was an attempted coup of the US president.
Wait until the American public find out how much they have been lied to!
Author: Jim Hoft
Source: The Gateway Pundit: MUST READ: The Complete List of DNC “Whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella’s Ties to Top Democrats WILL SHOCK YOU!
NO Q REPORT
This has been said before but it’s worth repeating. In fact, it’s worth beating this drum again and again until the truth is shared with as many Americans as possible. Alleged Ukraine whistleblower Eric Ciaramella is being distanced from the impeachment inquiry for one reason and one reason only: He’s a manufactured whistleblower who may be the only person in Washington DC with less credibility than Adam Schiff.
The CIA operative’s ties to major Democrats and anti-Trump members of the intelligence community are so thick, it’s no wonder they were adamant about his identity remaining hidden. This wasn’t just standard whistleblower protection. This was narrative protection first and foremost. If Americans knew the whistleblower had been fired from National Security Council for leaking sensitive information from the White House, the people would have been skeptical. If they also learned he worked for Joe Biden and traveled with him to Ukraine, the people would understand why he was filing the complaint.
But it gets worse. It turns out his connections to taking down President Trump date back to before the 2016 election. He worked with Alexandra Chalupa, who Glenn Beck exposed as directly contributing to the Russian-collusion hoax, among other things. Then, there’s the false report that Vladimir Putin ordered President Trump to fire James Comey. Yep, that whopper came from our guy Ciaramella.
The list goes on and on, from direct ties to current Schiff staffers who worked with him a the NSC to coordination with people like Susan Rice, James Clapper, and John Brennan. And yet, mainstream media won’t even mention his name. This is why we need patriots to help us get the word out.
This is all information Democrats are desperate to keep from the American people. The very premise behind this whole impeachment debacle is so manufactured, so corrupt, it makes the Clinton Foundation seem like a saintly organization. This is why Democrats are desperate to keep Ciaramella as far away from the impeachment inquiry as possible despite demanding that he testify secretly before his identity was revealed.
This video by IPOT (In Pursuit Of Truth) breaks down most of the shady dealings surrounding alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella. He’s not a conscientious citizen blowing the whistle. He’s a partisan hack doing the bidding of the “Deep State.”
Re: Impeachment
How is this video which is unequivocal proof of quid pro quo for personal gain never seen on MSM. They always refer to the Biden Ukraine issues as unfounded and debunked conspiracy theories. WTF?Moe Gibbs wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 5:56 pmhttps://youtu.be/rnIPw_Who7E Exhibit "A" of VP Joe Biden extorting the Ukrainian president with OUR money.
Odd how the media [as well as SNOPES] says this is a "debunked conspiracy theory", when Joe Biden openly brags about commiting the quid pro quo
I am amazed that Globalist controlled You Tube hasn't taken this video down yet. They must know that it's already too late to hide the truth...?
JANUARY 22, 2020
Biden campaign issues warning to the media: Fall in line and debunk corruption claims
It is 'malpractice' not to debunk the claims
Phil Shiver
On Monday, Joe Biden's presidential campaign issued a warning to reporters and editors in a circulated memorandum demanding that they debunk claims of corruption against him.
The memo, titled, "The Imperative for Honest Coverage of Trump's Ukraine Conspiracy Theory," dealt specifically with the charge that then-Vice President Biden, as the Obama administration's point man in Ukraine, pushed for a Ukrainian prosecutor to be fired by threatening to withhold aid to the country.
The fired prosecutor, Victor Shokin, was reportedly removed at the same time he was investigating Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company where Biden's son, Hunter, sat on the board.
It is 'malpractice' not to debunk the claims
According to the Biden campaign, President Trump's impeachment was due in large part to his efforts to spread this theory.
"[Trump's] objective was to pressure the Ukrainian government into spreading a malicious and conclusively debunked conspiracy theory: that Vice President Biden engaged in wrongdoing when he executed official United States policy to remove a corrupt prosecutor from office," communications director Kate Bedingfield wrote in the memo.
In the memo, Bedingfield cites numerous mainstream news outlets that agree with Biden's version of the story and that discredit the theory that Biden pushed for the firing of the prosecutor to cover up corruption.
Accordingly, she goes on to instruct the media to "state clearly and unambiguously that [such claims of corruption] have been discredited and debunked" during their ongoing impeachment coverage.
To do otherwise would be journalistic "malpractice," she warns.
"It is not sufficient to say the allegations are 'unsubstantiated' or that 'no evidence has emerged to support them.' Not only is there 'no evidence' for Republicans' main argument against the Vice President — there is a mountain of evidence that actively debunks it. And it is malpractice to ignore that truth."
Reporting on the news, The Hill called the Biden campaign memo the "strongest rebuke yet" of corruption allegations against the candidate.
The media falls in line
Despite numerous outlets having reported the claims as false, Republicans and Trump defenders are not so convinced.
In fact, it was Biden himself who added fuel to the theory's flame when he openly bragged on camera about successfully securing Shokin's firing during a meeting with the Council on Foreign Relations in 2018.
"I said, 'I'm telling you, you're not getting the billion dollars.' I said, 'you're not getting the billion.' I'm going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: 'I'm leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money.'" Biden recalled.
"Well, son of a bitch," he continued to laughter. "He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time."
But, HotAir reported that following the memo's release, already some in the media have agreed to the campaign's imperative.
MSNBC's Heidi Przybla said on air that the campaign's warning is "a preemptive strike against the disinformation that is really at the heart of the president's defense."
"This is a reminder ... that the entire premise of the [president's] argument is debunked. It is not just unsubstantiated," she continued, repeating the talking points.
Comments.....
"Someone who was solid"
Translation : someone who would close the investigation into Burisma and thus let my son off the hook.
None of the mainstream news outlets has ever played this on their broadcast. Why?
Thank you Joe for convicting yourself! Quid Pro Quo at it's finest!!! Your are corrupt!!!
Dang I thought this was supposed to be fake? Looks pretty real to me
Keep sharing, they're [You Tube] taking/hiding this video.
Thank you for posting! I hope this doesn't get taken down.
So your strategy is to blame and impeach your opponent for exactly what you did and pretend it never happened? Brilliant! When will people ever wake up?
Biden admitted to extortion. Clearly.
I think that they call this "Quid Pro Quo", but I guess it's alright as long as it is not
a Republican doing it. And how about Obama's witholding Congressional funds for
Ukraine's military during his whole administration's time in office.
Simply incredible. From the horse's mouth--here's Biden (and Obama, apparently) doing precisely what the dems have falsely accused Trump of doing. How long before YouTube restricts this video, I wonder.
dt
Re: Impeachment
I'm just a wacked out conspiracy theorist who believes there are basically two types of people in the USA.
1. Those who believe there is a Globalist Agenda to assume control [more control than what they already have] of every White ruled nation on Earth.
2. Those who don't.
well then of course we have endless shades of category 2
My Dad spent his entire working career in Mass Media and pointed out what was behind all the manufactured fads and trends that he witnessed from the 1960s on. He pointed out that no trends, fads or other happenings that occur on a large scale "just happen". They are all deliberately engineered for a purpose. Those who took control the US media in early 1900s were basically the same gang of Rothschild Agents who established the JADL, the NAACP and of course the Federal Reserve. Jacob Schiff's name pops up quite often as one of Rothschild's key operatives.