Salary Cap situation and Rookie Contracts

Post Reply
User avatar
D-train
Posts: 82742
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Salary Cap situation and Rookie Contracts

Post by D-train » Thu Jun 01, 2023 1:59 pm

Interesting stuff here. Makes me sick with we have to deal with this Cap stuff while having the richest owner and the Mariners have no Cap and have a bunch of cheap ass Billionaire wannabees for owners.

Also stunning how little the rookies make, even the 1st rounders. That POS 2B Kolten Wong will make more than Spoon and JSN COMBINED this year. Insert projectile vomit emoji here.
By Bob Condotta
Seattle Times staff reporter
When the Seahawks restructured the contract of receiver Tyler Lockett in early May, they might have also raised the expectation that a big move was on the horizon.

Lockett’s restructure — in which his 2023 base salary of $8.53 million was turned into a bonus, allowing it to be spread out over the final three years of his deal for salary cap purposes — cleared almost $5.7 million in cap space for this year.

The idea that the move was done mostly to create room Seattle needed for draft picks and other less-expensive signings appears to be coming to fruition.

Seattle has made just two roster moves of any real significance since then, re-signing veteran cornerback Artie Burns and signing free agent defensive end Mario Edwards Jr.


As was revealed Wednesday, each was acquired about as cheaply as possible.

Burns signed a one-year deal for the veteran minimum worth up to $1.080 million but with a cap charge of $940,000, while Edwards signed a veteran salary benefit deal in which he gets $1.165 million with a signing bonus of $152,500 but counts $1.092 million against the cap.

Those signings bring Seattle’s total salary cap space down to just over $7.9 million, according to OvertheCap.com.

But, according to OTC, the Seahawks are still in the red when it comes to effective cap space — a calculation of how much space the team really has — at minus-$984,175.

That’s because the Seahawks have yet to sign three of their first four draft picks — first-round cornerback Devon Witherspoon, taken fifth overall; as well as second-round picks defensive end Derick Hall and running back Zach Charbonnet. Until signed, their full contracts do not count against the salary cap (they instead count for a standard $750,000).

Once signed, Witherspoon’s contract is projected for a $5.7 million cap hit, which accounts for much of OvertheCap.com’s estimate of Seattle’s negative effective cap space number.

Seattle has signed its other first-round pick, receiver Jaxon Smith-Njigba, taken 20th overall. He signed a four-year deal worth up to $14.4 million on May 11, the same day Lockett’s restructure was reported.

Via the terms of the league’s collective bargaining agreement, all drafted players get four-year deals worth an amount based on where they were selected, descending in value with each pick.

That change, which began with a CBA enacted in 2011, essentially eliminated holdouts by draft picks and made it almost non-news when a player signs.

However, while the years and overall dollar values are not negotiable, some things are, which is why not all rookies sign immediately.

Among negotiable items are how many years of base salary are guaranteed, the schedule of payments for signing bonuses and offset language.

Offset language involves guaranteed salary a team could be on the hook for if a player is cut before his rookie deal runs out.

First-round picks have all four years of their base salaries guaranteed.

Many teams, though, try to insert offset language into the contracts, which means that if a player is cut, say, in the fourth year of his deal and then signs with another team, it does not owe him the full salary.

Essentially, offset language means a player can’t “double dip” by getting all of his salary from the team that cut him as well as money from a new team signing him. Without offset language, a player could essentially get two salaries for whatever seasons would be left on his rookie deal.

That Witherspoon has yet to sign isn’t a surprise — none of the top five picks have and only seven of the top 19.

More interesting may be that none of the top 25 second-round picks had signed as of the end of last week, including Hall and Charbonnet.

But, with all first-round picks now getting all four years of their contracts guaranteed, the perception is that there is now more negotiating with second-round picks in terms of guaranteed salary years, particularly in the third and fourth years.

Last year, the Seahawks guaranteed the first two years of the base salary for second-round pick Kenneth Walker III and roughly two-thirds of his Year Three salary ($1.03 million of a total of $1.47 million).

Sponsored
The Seahawks did similarly with their other second-round pick last year, Boye Mafe. They did not do that with second-round pick Dee Eskridge in 2021 — he had only the first two years of his deal guaranteed.

Rookies who have not signed their contracts can sign waivers protecting them against injury to take part in offseason programs. But they cannot participate in training camp without a signed contract.

Teams can always restructure contracts to try to create some immediate cap space.

But, that also just pushes that cap spending into the future, and Seattle has typically tried to avoid that tactic more than necessary.

And the Seahawks already have what is on paper a somewhat tight cap situation for 2024, currently listed with just over $24 million, according to OvertheCap.com, 21st overall.

However, that number includes the huge increase in Geno Smith’s cap number from $10.1 million in 2023 to $31.2 million in 2024. And with no guaranteed money beyond 2023, that ballooning cap number is one reason many assume Smith won’t play out that deal, likely instead to get a reworked contract to stay beyond 2023.

ADVERTISING
The restructuring of Lockett’s contract means his cap number will increase from $11.06 million this year to $26.89 million in 2024, making him another likely candidate to get a reworked deal.

Safety Jamal Adams also has a hefty $23.6 million cap number in 2024 but with no guaranteed money, making it almost certain that if he stays in Seattle beyond the 2023 season — of which there is no guarantee — it will be on a different contract.

When Seattle signed safety Julian Love in March, some wondered if the Seahawks might have had an eye on doing something with Adams’ contract for this year, or possibly even releasing him.

But the Seahawks envision Adams being a major part of the team this season once he recovers from a quadriceps injury suffered last September — he also has $2.56 million of his salary for this year already guaranteed.

At this point, the Seahawks might not want to do anything with Adams’ contract to push cap hits into the future.

General manager John Schneider reiterated earlier this year that the team doesn’t have just a cap budget but also a cash one — meaning, how much money the team actually pays out to players in any given year.

ADVERTISING
Seattle is on the hook for more than $242 million in cash spending in 2023, currently 15th-most in the NFL, according to OvertheCap.com.

But that does not include the contracts of the three unsigned rookies — Witherspoon’s deal, for instance, comes with a predetermined signing bonus of $20.1 million. Though, as noted, when that money is paid out is something that can be negotiated.

What this all means is that, barring a significant move to create more cap space, the Seahawks roster you see is mostly the one you are likely to get when training camp begins in late July.
dt

Donn Beach
Posts: 20789
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Salary Cap situation and Rookie Contracts

Post by Donn Beach » Sat Jun 03, 2023 5:43 am

Hawks release Forrest Merrill, we hardly knew ye

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 82742
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Salary Cap situation and Rookie Contracts

Post by D-train » Sat Jun 03, 2023 1:11 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Sat Jun 03, 2023 5:43 am
Hawks release Forrest Merrill, we hardly knew ye
I couldn't see the Forrest for the Reeds!
reeds.JPG
reeds.JPG (12.98 KiB) Viewed 579 times
dt

User avatar
Sexymarinersfan
Posts: 9090
Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 11:34 pm
Location: Ft. Worth Texas
Contact:

Re: Salary Cap situation and Rookie Contracts

Post by Sexymarinersfan » Mon Jun 05, 2023 2:57 pm

Fresh off the draft and with the bulk of free agency complete, I wanted to share some thoughts on the 2023 roster the Seahawks have put together when it comes to the on-field product the team will roll out this fall. There is terrific potential for a high value return all over the roster, as well as very real risk at certain spots on the roster that could actually reduce that overall value.

We have talked about this at length recently. Value, in its purest form, is getting more on the field than what you pay for in cap space. True success in the NFL depends on it.

I think we can all agree the Seahawks have had a very productive offseason with their roster moves. The plan appears far more effective, needs are being addressed and perhaps most importantly, they are recalibrating their processes to a healthy degree.

As the team transitions into the offseason activities, finalizing the main pieces on the roster and evaluating their major additions, the focus shifts from acquiring pieces from the marketplace to making those pieces fit into a cohesive team that produces more value than the sum total of their salary cap expenditures.

How can they take that next step from scraping into the playoffs to a team that regularly makes deeper postseason runs? What will ultimately drive this team forward in 2023?

Two major points of roster value.

Avoiding ‘Comatose Cap Space’

What is that? Well, if dead cap space is cap space allocated to players no longer on the roster, comatose cap space can be defined as cap space for players on the roster but contributing very little to the overall success of the team, if not being a drain on the roster.

The Seahawks were lousy with this brand of cap space in 2022.

Jamal Adams busted a finger the first day of camp and then tore his quad in the first game of the season, continuing his pattern of frequently being unavailable due to injury. The coaching staff more than once made comments to the effect that they built a large part of the defensive strategy around this constantly injured player – a startling revelation that borders on malpractice if true.

Gabe Jackson struggled to have any impact at all on the offensive line. The team spent 2021 with a weak spot at left guard while Damien Lewis adjusted to being moved in order to accommodate Jackson on the right side. 2022 proved to be a predictable flip in effectiveness – Lewis excelled on the left while Jackson floundered on the right in a job-sharing role with Phil Haynes.

Poona Ford played out of position in the last year of a back-loaded contract as the team sought to revamp their defensive line strategy and the results demonstrated that clearly.

Rashaad Penny had only one above-average game after closing 2021 with a flourish. The offense badly needed an effective running game as Geno Smith settled into his new job, Ken Walker was brought along slowly in the early going after a hernia surgery and the defense was being the defense early on.

Quandre Diggs did not play nearly up to his potential through the first two thirds of the season. Coming off a serious injury, helping cover the inept tackling at linebacker and the general disaster of a defensive line all greatly sapped his ability to provide real value as a ballhawk and guided-missile hitter.

All told, those players accounted for about $40 million in cap space last year – nearly 20% of their available cap space. It was a serious drain on resources that bogged the team down and prevented them from truly capitalizing on amazing value gains such as Geno Smith’s breakthrough season, a low-cost high-yield season by D.K. Metcalf and an excellent rookie class delivering better than they had any right to.

Is it reasonable to expect the team to have zero wasted space in 2023? To have no major injuries and have every player at least return his full cap hit in value? Of course not.

Every team has injuries. Every team has expensive players that sputter at times. Often what defines a successful program is the coaching, depth development and scheming around these speedbumps with a degree of acumen that keeps your whole program as on-schedule as can be reasonably allowed. It also means having the foresight and planning ability to smooth out those speedbumps before they even materialize.

If we can identify these speedbumps, we may be able to better understand how competitive the Seahawks will be this fall and evaluate their progress as the season goes on.

Potential Challenges to Value in 2023

Let’s start with the low-hanging fruit: the defense as a whole.

The team has made major changes to all three levels of its defense. Once again, they have significantly re-worked their defensive line following a frustrating year. They have brought Bobby Wagner back to bring some stability to the linebackers and signed Julian Love as a Swiss army knife to provide depth and flexibility to the defensive backfield.

They must get this unit to gel much, much quicker than they traditionally have in the past. It was a breath of fresh air to hear Pete Carroll admit after this last season that they may have set their sights too high in making all the defensive changes. As we discussed above, you could see how badly it affected every corner of the defense.

What is riding on making this defense more consistent in 2023?

They have expensive free agent acquisitions with cheap cap hits this year in Julian Love ($3.9m) and Dre Jones ($10m), structured to fit under the cap. But those contracts are scheduled to expand significantly in 2024 (to $8m and $18m respectively). The roster value advantage of the first-year lower cap hit is a limited-time benefit they must take advantage of. If those two spend a whole year adjusting to a gameplan that is not well-structured from the start rather than being put in a position to succeed in short order, that benefit evaporates and forces a ‘must improve quickly and dramatically to justify the expenditure’ situation for both players in 2024.

The team also needs the defense to be able to cover any growing pains from the 2022 and 2023 draft classes. As we saw last year, oftentimes the rookies were the ones outplaying the veterans. Any coach will tell you that is playing with fire.

Perhaps most importantly, they need a unified vision for the defense because the back end is carrying an incredible cap weight. Brass tacks: there is no way that Diggs and Adams can return $36 million of roster value in 2023. The best you can do is minimize that deficit by having sound structure around them that allows them to do what they do best.

A challenge that has really plagued this huge investment at the position is they have logged just as many games apart as they have together. And yet, when playing together, the defense has never truly realized the benefit of one of the league’s most talked-about and highest-compensated duos to a degree that satisfies the price paid.

Diggs had five interceptions and Adams had nine and a half sacks in 2020 for one of the worst defenses in the NFL.

Diggs had another five picks in 2021 and Adams was used in a completely different role and could not tilt the field much at all in another poor defensive year.

2022? We covered that above.

In three years, we have not seen what these two talented players can really do because the team has not provided them with adequate teammates or in other ways taken advantage of their talents. Therefore, there truly has not been enough return on investment to justify it.

As has been discussed at length, there is yet one more way the Front Office can chip in some value on this front: reworking Adams’ contract, reducing the salary down so the 2023 hit is less than $18 million without pushing any money into 2024. This makes too much sense to not at least approach Adams and have that conversation.

There are other potential value challenges on the offensive side. Tyler Lockett, D.K. Metcalf and Will Dissly hit the cap for $34 million in 2023 and we should not overlook them as high-dollar contracts that may not live up to their promise. Yet Lockett and Metcalf have an excellent track record when it comes to providing value and while Dissly’s $9 million cap hit is not ideal, it is highly unlikely to make a significant dent in the team’s output on the field if he is not absolutely worth every penny.

It is all about the defense at this point. The next three months are critical. The installation, the prepping, the practice and the decisions they make could push this team significantly forward or keep them treading water in NFL purgatory.

Thankfully, the offense looks so potent and the bar for the defense is not set at an unattainable level. This squad as currently constructed should meet every expectation that they return a result that is at least in the middle of the pack in the NFL in 2023.

That is what successful teams do. They manage expensive (but necessary) components of their roster that may not provide big value to such a degree that they do not hinder the entire team from achieving their goals.

The Seahawks must find a way to at least break even in defensive value in 2023. Anything less would be a spoiling of the great work the team has done to improve the roster this spring.

What makes that job easier, particularly from Pete Carroll’s standpoint?

There is Ready Value All Over This 2023 Roster

There is an abundance of young, hungry talent along with some cost-controlled veterans to work with. Instead of just relying on a good quarterback surrounded by tired veteran retreads and one or two young standouts to keep the team afloat, a look at this roster should get every fan excited about the seasons to come. It will also keep breathing life into Carroll’s enthusiasm for pushing this team towards success.

We have eaten our vegetables by talking about the hard work to make this defense go. Now let’s have dessert by talking about the ‘fun work.’

Let us count the ways:

— The quarterback room has a cap of $14.1 million. That includes a $10m number for Geno Smith, coming off a 69.8% completion season where he took all the snaps and delivered 30 touchdowns and only threw 11 interceptions. Yes, they have pushed out significant cap to 2024 but this team is poised to get big, big value from the position in 2023. With all of his weapons and a second full year in this offense, an improvement is a reasonable expectation.

— The starting five offensive linemen with Evan Brown at center have a total cap charge of $15.6 million this season and are on track to be the best one the team has had in years.

— The top four running backs will cost the team just over $4.25 million of cap room and could put a charge into this whole team with their game-breaking ability, toughness and versatility. If Kenny McIntosh makes the final 53, he will likely be the 52nd or 53rd lowest salary on the team, meaning the Seahawks may not be charged any salary cap money in 2023 for him depending on how they manage the bottom of the roster. Seriously. A returner, a special teams man, a third runner and a pass catcher for free. He could be a unicorn that provides ‘infinity value’ to the team this fall because he has no cap cost.

— They could end up having seven players across the defensive line making less than $2.15 million each in 2023 and four of them figure to have very prominent roles: Darrell Taylor, Boye Mafe, Derick Hall and Cameron Young.

— The cornerbacks. Oh my, the cornerbacks. They have five players who can plug in and start for stretches totalling a mere $10.13 million in cap space. They might have a top 5-10 cornerback room this year for the sum cost of less than nine games of Jalen Ramsey.

It is going to be a joy to watch these players in training camp and in the preseason. One of the greatest sights in professional sports fandom is witnessing talented athletes transforming into great pro players and helping their team ascend to new levels. We will have a front row seat to see this fantastic cross section of young talent develop right before our eyes.

Make no mistake though, there is pressure on the staff to keep developing the 2022 draft class above and beyond just the natural need to develop your young players. Starters like Walker, Woolen and the tackles have a lot of room to grow. Players like Mafe, Bryant and even Dareke Young need to take that next step to where they get significant snaps regularly.

The hallmarks of the 2023 draft class should also serve them well in developing at a good pace. Their abundant qualities like toughness, skill and versatility will very likely result in players like Witherspoon, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Derick Hall and Zach Charbonnet seeing significant playing time this season.

It is absolutely crucial that the Seahawks do everything in their power to nurture these two draft classes along in 2023. Why?

One way or another, they are going to have to make a big investment in 2024. Be it in the form of keeping Geno Smith and his major cap hit on the roster, re-committing to him in the form of a contract reworking, or making the move in the draft and acquiring a quarterback of the future.

They also (at this time anyway) have $39 million committed to the two safeties in 2024 that they will need to decide on.

The more successful they are at finding value with these talented but low-cost players in 2023, the easier it will be to make critical decisions in 2024 that really help the Seahawks reach the next tier of NFL teams.

Honestly, these two areas – putting expensive veterans in a position to succeed and developing their young talent – have arguably been the weakest areas in the entire organization in recent years. The post-Super Bowl era has been littered with cap space wasted in free agency and young draft picks either not developed or quickly cast aside in favor of those expensive veteran players.

It will be a very big challenge for the team to shake off those bad habits and refocus.

It is fair to say that the front office has re-evaluated their methods and taken great advantage of the opportunities available to them to acquire some serious young talent and free agents who have not reached their ceiling yet.

They now need the player development and coaching arms of the club to follow suit. Can they do it? Can they make this roster into a team that is more than the sum of its parts?

We will see.

~Curtis Allen

Pharmabro
Posts: 7089
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 8:32 am

Re: Salary Cap situation and Rookie Contracts

Post by Pharmabro » Thu Jun 08, 2023 4:01 am

They have near 18 M in dead money which is something they have avoided in years past:
Here are the main sources but then there is about 20 more with smaller $
Gabe Jackson G - $4,762,223
Carlos Dunlap DE - $4,200,000
Shelby Harris DT - $3,260,588
Quinton Jefferson DT - $2,000,000
Al Woods DT - $1,750,000
Christopher Carson RB - - $1,500,000
Fr5eddie Swain and Bo Melton $100K

SeattleAddict
Posts: 3728
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2020 7:25 pm

Re: Salary Cap situation and Rookie Contracts

Post by SeattleAddict » Mon Jun 12, 2023 2:04 am

Pharmabro wrote:
Thu Jun 08, 2023 4:01 am
They have near 18 M in dead money which is something they have avoided in years past:
Here are the main sources but then there is about 20 more with smaller $
Gabe Jackson G - $4,762,223
Carlos Dunlap DE - $4,200,000
Shelby Harris DT - $3,260,588
Quinton Jefferson DT - $2,000,000
Al Woods DT - $1,750,000
Christopher Carson RB - - $1,500,000
Fr5eddie Swain and Bo Melton $100K
not really unusual. Seahawks dead cap numbers by year:
2022: 57 million (RW was 26m of that, but that still left 29m of others)
2021: 14m
2020: 16m

The Seahawks have been better than some teams at avoiding the crippling contracts, but definitely haven't the dead money altogether. If they cut Adams, that number jumps up considerably, too.

Post Reply