Thread for draft simulations:
Re: Thread for draft simulations:
What there is a pretty good consensus on is that Booker and Zabel are the top 2 and Jackson is 3 as far as interior guys, with Booker widely rated ahead in general, but Zabel being slightly better in the wide zone scheme that Kubiak runs. So in my mind, now that we whiffed in FA, absent a trade for a proven starter such as Wyatt Teller from Cleveland (as some have postulated the Browns might be willing to part with), the Hawks draft now absolutely must include one of either Booker, Zabel, or Jackson. It's likely but no lock they can stick and pick at 18 and get one of the top 2, and even more likely they could get Jackson trading back a few spots. But you gotta land one of those three.
- Sibelius Hindemith
- Posts: 14063
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Thread for draft simulations:
What about the tackles Conerly and Savaiinaea? It's possible that Banks could drop to 18 as well.
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 16807
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Thread for draft simulations:
JS isn't feeding at the top of the food chain. He's going to draft some Oline talent but it's going to be day two. |And the fact is the talent curve is flat, particularly when it comes to offensive line players. Anyone of these guys could end up being the best choice. I'll go with Rutledge, his leadership qualities making the difference. As well as the killer mullet, gotta go with the mullet
- Sibelius Hindemith
- Posts: 14063
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Thread for draft simulations:
I'm going with Savaiiinaeaea.
Hoping it'll be Banks, Zabel or Booker though.
Hoping it'll be Banks, Zabel or Booker though.
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 16807
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Thread for draft simulations:
Samoan is a pretty good way to go as opposed to Georgia good ol boy
Re: Thread for draft simulations:
Yeah, forgot about Banks, as i really dont think he'll fall, and he's also a premier tackle, would only be filling in at G for us until Lucas goes down again, but what a great Guard he would be! but yes, Banks, Zabel or Booker please!Sibelius Hindemith wrote: ↑Sat Mar 29, 2025 4:14 amI'm going with Savaiiinaeaea.
Hoping it'll be Banks, Zabel or Booker though.
- Sibelius Hindemith
- Posts: 14063
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Thread for draft simulations:
Just saw a youtube video saying we should take Colston Loveland at 18. 

- Donn Beach
- Posts: 16807
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Thread for draft simulations:
Doesn't seem like a bad idea, be interesting if they went with an offense first tight end. They could use s TE, here's a fantasy trade for Dallas Goedert.
https://www.si.com/nfl/seahawks/seahawk ... e-proposal
https://www.si.com/nfl/seahawks/seahawk ... e-proposal
- Donn Beach
- Posts: 16807
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Thread for draft simulations:
Daniel Jeremiah mocked Loveland to the hawks, was that the video?
I could get behind that, I'm big on TE's, your guard is day twoThe Seahawks might have bigger needs, but the value is just too great to pass up Loveland at No. 18. The former Michigan tight end joins Jaxon Smith-Njigba and Cooper Kupp to give Sam Darnold an intriguing group of pass catchers.
As polarizing as Graham’s tenure was, no Seahawks tight end since has surpassed Graham’s lowest yardage total (Noah Fant’s 500 yards last season were closest). Before Graham, you’d have to go back to John Carlson’s 2009 season (579 yards) to find someone who surpassed Graham’s lowest single season yardage (520)
Last edited by Donn Beach on Sat Mar 29, 2025 11:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.