Again, I would allow much more leeway to the blame game on Grubb, if it just wasn't yet another Bates, Bevell, Shotty and Waldron. Same shit, different year, different OC, same solution. Same man making the call. Have we won? Yep, but have we really been a threat once Beast and Russ couldn't control the line of scrimmage with the Read Option? I go back to the first half dominance by Carolina. That was because Pete tried to play Pete football with a team not equipped. They weren't equipped because they could no longer run the ball because the O Line was getting destroyed every snap. Without Russ playing streetball, and without the passing game last year?auroraave wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 4:06 pm
I agree the oline is an issue - not really debatable. I do think there are factors involved not HELPING the situation - like Grubb. This team won 10 games last year - they didn't look that good at times but think of what an experienced OC could have gleaned from this roster. You have to put guys in positions to succeed, you have to scheme to your strengths and weaknesses - I don't think Grubb did that on any level. He has a great playbook, but that doesn't help if you aren't factoring in the other teams strengths, weaknesses and schemes. That's where he failed and where I think the new OC excels.
Did you see the stat I posted from Danny O'Neill's article in November?
Yet we fired the guy for not running the ball enough. This team couldn't have run the ball against Georgia, let alone the fucking Rams and Vikings! But it must be nice, build a shitty O Line year in and year out, and then deflect the blame to coaching and scheme. Only in Seattle. JS would have been placed in witness protection in most major NFL cities for fifteen years of this bullshit.Over the past two weeks, the Seahawks have driven inside the opponent’s 20-yard line seven times. On those seven red-zone possessions, they have run the ball 11 times for a net of -1 yards.