So what?Donn Beach wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2026 11:08 pmHe didnt want to be thereCaptain 97 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2026 4:25 pmI wouldn't have given Walker that contract but I really don't understand why they didn't franchise him. They have the cap space this year and it would haven given them some insurance while Charbonet recovers without the potential of the contract becoming an Albatross down the line. After signing Shaheed and Jobe, they still have 42 Million of cap space left. Unless they are going to trade for a big contract, I don't see how giving Walker 14.5 Million for one year would have limited them from anything else they had in mind for this off season. In my opinion you cant go into the season with Holani, McIntosh, Jones and a possible rookie out of the draft as your only options. I would think that they will be forced to trade for somebody established at this point.
Free Agents - Cap Space - who stays, who's gone
-
Captain 97
- Posts: 3739
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm
Re: Free Agents - Cap Space - who stays, who's gone
-
Donn Beach
- Posts: 19293
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Free Agents - Cap Space - who stays, who's gone
You look at JSs history of using it, he's done it twice. Mare who they ended up extending and Clark who they traded with the Chiefs extending him. The reasons I see were not wanting to pay Walker that much and not wanting to tie up a player that doesn't have a future with the team
-
Captain 97
- Posts: 3739
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm
Re: Free Agents - Cap Space - who stays, who's gone
They sign players to one year deals all the time. Do you consider that to be Tying up a player that doesn't have a future with the team? To me this is is exactly what the franchise tag was made for. Its basically like picking up an option.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Tue Mar 17, 2026 11:35 pmYou look at JSs history of using it, he's done it twice. Mare who they ended up extending and Clark who they traded with the Chiefs extending him. The reasons I see were not wanting to pay Walker that much and not wanting to tie up a player that doesn't have a future with the team
-
Donn Beach
- Posts: 19293
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Free Agents - Cap Space - who stays, who's gone
I've kinda wondered about this. JS looks forward, not backward. They could see Walker not being as necessary for what they have in mind for the offense next season. I think you have to take into account player development. It's not just about adding players, you're expecting development from the players you already have on your roster
Seaside Joe
Seaside Joe
When I think of a true “breakout” season, I think of Ernest Jones IV last year. Jones had already established himself as a linebacker who was good enough to start but even his contract reflected a player who still had to prove himself: His $9.5m AAV is only 20th at the position.
Then he comes out of 2025 looking like a top-5 inside linebacker, intercepting six passes including playoffs.
There’s been an over-emphasis on the players who Seattle let leave in free agency as a reason for doubts to creep in but sometimes a team’s best replacement of VALUE is not going to be someone at the same position:
It’s like if you sell your car and don’t immediately go buy another car, your friends might think that riding a bicycle is a sign of financial ruin; but maybe you just want to get in shape.
What if the Seahawks were okay with losing Kenneth Walker III because they’re really excited about Tory Horton, A.J. Barner, Elijah Arroyo, Shaheed, and George Holani? This is a list of players that were top of mind for me as far as breakouts and I already know you’d add more names to it:
Re: Free Agents - Cap Space - who stays, who's gone
No such thing as a bad one year deal. Would have be gone by the time they needed to reup JSN And Spoon.Captain 97 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2026 3:04 pmThey sign players to one year deals all the time. Do you consider that to be Tying up a player that doesn't have a future with the team? To me this is is exactly what the franchise tag was made for. Its basically like picking up an option.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Tue Mar 17, 2026 11:35 pmYou look at JSs history of using it, he's done it twice. Mare who they ended up extending and Clark who they traded with the Chiefs extending him. The reasons I see were not wanting to pay Walker that much and not wanting to tie up a player that doesn't have a future with the team
dt
Re: Free Agents - Cap Space - who stays, who's gone
Jones might be a top three move in JS career. Not only as a player but my God him having Sam's back after the first Rams game. That MFer is a Dude. Seem like a grizzled seasoned vet but he is barely old enough to rent a fucking car.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2026 3:08 pmI've kinda wondered about this. JS looks forward, not backward. They could see Walker not being as necessary for what they have in mind for the offense next season. I think you have to take into account player development. It's not just about adding players, you're expecting development from the players you already have on your roster
Seaside JoeWhen I think of a true “breakout” season, I think of Ernest Jones IV last year. Jones had already established himself as a linebacker who was good enough to start but even his contract reflected a player who still had to prove himself: His $9.5m AAV is only 20th at the position.
Then he comes out of 2025 looking like a top-5 inside linebacker, intercepting six passes including playoffs.
There’s been an over-emphasis on the players who Seattle let leave in free agency as a reason for doubts to creep in but sometimes a team’s best replacement of VALUE is not going to be someone at the same position:
It’s like if you sell your car and don’t immediately go buy another car, your friends might think that riding a bicycle is a sign of financial ruin; but maybe you just want to get in shape.
What if the Seahawks were okay with losing Kenneth Walker III because they’re really excited about Tory Horton, A.J. Barner, Elijah Arroyo, Shaheed, and George Holani? This is a list of players that were top of mind for me as far as breakouts and I already know you’d add more names to it:
dt
-
Nwadventure
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 4:21 pm
Re: Free Agents - Cap Space - who stays, who's gone
Funny- Had to google his age- Flying up tomorrow - teriyaki time !D-train wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2026 5:16 pmJones might be a top three move in JS career. Not only as a player but my God him having Sam's back after the first Rams game. That MFer is a Dude. Seem like a grizzled seasoned vet but he is barely old enough to rent a fucking car.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2026 3:08 pmI've kinda wondered about this. JS looks forward, not backward. They could see Walker not being as necessary for what they have in mind for the offense next season. I think you have to take into account player development. It's not just about adding players, you're expecting development from the players you already have on your roster
Seaside JoeWhen I think of a true “breakout” season, I think of Ernest Jones IV last year. Jones had already established himself as a linebacker who was good enough to start but even his contract reflected a player who still had to prove himself: His $9.5m AAV is only 20th at the position.
Then he comes out of 2025 looking like a top-5 inside linebacker, intercepting six passes including playoffs.
There’s been an over-emphasis on the players who Seattle let leave in free agency as a reason for doubts to creep in but sometimes a team’s best replacement of VALUE is not going to be someone at the same position:
It’s like if you sell your car and don’t immediately go buy another car, your friends might think that riding a bicycle is a sign of financial ruin; but maybe you just want to get in shape.
What if the Seahawks were okay with losing Kenneth Walker III because they’re really excited about Tory Horton, A.J. Barner, Elijah Arroyo, Shaheed, and George Holani? This is a list of players that were top of mind for me as far as breakouts and I already know you’d add more names to it: