Post Mortem: Hawks v 9 Volts

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 83434
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Post Mortem: Hawks v 9 Volts

Post by D-train » Tue Oct 06, 2026 4:02 am

Donn Beach wrote: ↑
Tue Oct 06, 2026 3:30 am
D-train wrote: ↑
Mon Oct 05, 2026 11:45 pm
Yeah I get it it's no big deal for your soft on crime tribe. I guess it's Seattle so the majority of fans won't have any issue with it whatsoever.
It's more not condemning by association. I have no idea what Prices childhood friends are up to or do I care. A lot of people came out in defense of Arnolds character. If he was to be found innocent then I don't see a reason not to have him on the team
Childhood friends??? He obviously knew those guys or they wouldn't have known he was robbed. My understanding is they were staying with him at the VRBO?? That guy literally agreed to testify against Arnold in his plea deal. Arnold is the big fish. They aren't going to charge him and then drop the chargers after securing a key witness. He's fucked imo.
dt

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 83434
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Post Mortem: Hawks v 9 Volts

Post by D-train » Tue Oct 06, 2026 4:04 am

trharder wrote: ↑
Tue Oct 06, 2026 3:59 am
Michael K. wrote: ↑
Mon Oct 05, 2026 8:23 pm
Now, how many part time jobs pay $200 to $350 K!? But still. Make them full time and require them to do more stuff off season to prepare to be, well....less shitty!
I would fire most of them and start over with younger, hungrier, more humble types.
I would start with that crew we saw Sunday.
fyi there is a NFL officials union. They don't take to kindly to most of their members being fired...
dt

Donn Beach
Posts: 21188
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Post Mortem: Hawks v 9 Volts

Post by Donn Beach » Tue Oct 06, 2026 4:35 am

D-train wrote: ↑
Tue Oct 06, 2026 4:02 am
Donn Beach wrote: ↑
Tue Oct 06, 2026 3:30 am
D-train wrote: ↑
Mon Oct 05, 2026 11:45 pm
Yeah I get it it's no big deal for your soft on crime tribe. I guess it's Seattle so the majority of fans won't have any issue with it whatsoever.
It's more not condemning by association. I have no idea what Prices childhood friends are up to or do I care. A lot of people came out in defense of Arnolds character. If he was to be found innocent then I don't see a reason not to have him on the team
Childhood friends??? He obviously knew those guys or they wouldn't have known he was robbed. My understanding is they were staying with him at the VRBO?? That guy literally agreed to testify against Arnold in his plea deal. Arnold is the big fish. They aren't going to charge him and then drop the chargers after securing a key witness. He's fucked imo.
That's how the guy is being characterized. If arnold went to trial and was found innocent, that is, those friends acted on their own I wouldn't have a particular concern about giving him a job playing football.

Donn Beach
Posts: 21188
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Post Mortem: Hawks v 9 Volts

Post by Donn Beach » Tue Oct 06, 2026 4:36 am

D-train wrote: ↑
Tue Oct 06, 2026 4:04 am
trharder wrote: ↑
Tue Oct 06, 2026 3:59 am
Michael K. wrote: ↑
Mon Oct 05, 2026 8:23 pm
Now, how many part time jobs pay $200 to $350 K!? But still. Make them full time and require them to do more stuff off season to prepare to be, well....less shitty!
I would fire most of them and start over with younger, hungrier, more humble types.
I would start with that crew we saw Sunday.
fyi there is a NFL officials union. They don't take to kindly to most of their members being fired...
And what's this age bias crap to begin with? lol

trharder
Posts: 2821
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 3:47 am

Re: Post Mortem: Hawks v 9 Volts

Post by trharder » Tue Oct 06, 2026 4:42 am

I noticed there wasn't a lot of talk about the Seahawk other than the officiating.
I have thoughts.
I never thought the officiating was fixed, or one sided. It was a balanced debauchery of a sporting event.
I don't hold the Seahawks offense and defense to the same standard. This is a defense minded team mirroring
their defense bent coach and D play caller. If the offense can score 30, that should do it. Currently this team
does not have a #1 running back and the O-line doesn't seem up to snuff. I agree with Mike Salk that Sam looked
tentative and a little off. Brock was more in the camp that no one was open. But 30 should do it with a defense like this.
My bitch is with the defense. They are big timing it - high on their regal fame and big contracts. My pet peeve player
currently is Spoon. Over an over he is flirting with a taunting penalty on every decent play he makes. I personally
would abolish the taunting penalty, but as long as it's 15 yards and an automatic 1st down, he better start taking
it seriously. I hear people point to E-man as the next Woolen, but for me it's Spoon. On top of the selfish personal
fouls, I've seen mental lapses where they fuck up basic shit like allowing big runs on 3rd down to the sidelines by
not sealing the edge. Brock and those who know stuff know, but they won't say it because they are greased by
homerism. I myself am a homer and firmly believe MM will get the D back to the mission over bull shit, MOB. MM
has his little sayings and he believes its a big deal. I think he will bring them back around. And a win is a win, but
I saw a post on X that I think is saying what I'm thinking better than I can. I leave you with that.
Attachments
mich.png
mich.png (117.48 KiB) Viewed 12 times

Post Reply