Perfect example of why we want minimal Govt. involvement

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 79052
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Perfect example of why we want minimal Govt. involvement

Post by D-train » Sat Feb 22, 2020 7:04 pm

So I go to the post office today in Somerville and the woman in front have me just asks to "borrow" some tape so she could seal her shipping box.

The employee who had one of the worst case of man boobs I have ever seen despite not really being over weight says, "Borrow? We have some for sale." While explaining that she just needs one piece he turns away and starts helping me.

So we are talking probably about one cent worth of tape. A normal business would want to keep her as a customer spending hundreds possibly even thousands of dollars a year on postage. They would happily let her use their tape given its a minuscule investment to do so. But a government run operation doesn't give a fuck and the guy probably gets off on shutting her down with no accountability or incentive to provide customer service.

And people want Government run healthcare. :roll:
dt

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 15394
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Perfect example of why we want minimal Govt. involvement

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Sat Feb 22, 2020 11:33 pm

Maybe it was that guy from Fight Club. :lol:

User avatar
Coeurd’Alene J
Posts: 5784
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 2:56 am

Re: Perfect example of why we want minimal Govt. involvement

Post by Coeurd’Alene J » Sat Feb 22, 2020 11:56 pm

I’ve had United Parcel always offer tape on a package. I went to fed ex Thursday and the lady was explicit that I needed my own tape......

They are Tape Nazi’s

User avatar
Moe Gibbs
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:26 pm

Re: Perfect example of why we want minimal Govt. involvement

Post by Moe Gibbs » Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:45 am

D-train wrote:
Sat Feb 22, 2020 7:04 pm
So I go to the post office today in Somerville and the woman in front have me just asks to "borrow" some tape so she could seal her shipping box.

The employee who had one of the worst case of man boobs I have ever seen despite not really being over weight says, "Borrow? We have some for sale." While explaining that she just needs one piece he turns away and starts helping me.

So we are talking probably about one cent worth of tape. A normal business would want to keep her as a customer spending hundreds possibly even thousands of dollars a year on postage. They would happily let her use their tape given its a minuscule investment to do so. But a government run operation doesn't give a fuck and the guy probably gets off on shutting her down with no accountability or incentive to provide customer service.

And people want Government run healthcare. :roll:
The government employee was carrying out SOP Protocol in order to obey his Superiors and I know that you know this. Problem is, this form of government forces "government employed people" to interact with the public in a way that they normally would not do. Big Government is a by product of having TOO MANY PEOPLE to begin with. The long range cure is to support ANY SOCIALTRENDS that will lead to lower birth rates and fewer outsiders allowed into the USA.

DanielVogelbach
Posts: 1263
Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:43 pm

Re: Perfect example of why we want minimal Govt. involvement

Post by DanielVogelbach » Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:53 am

Overpopulation is an interesting topic.

https://overpopulationisamyth.com/

It’s also good to view government as people rather than an abstraction.

User avatar
Moe Gibbs
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:26 pm

Re: Perfect example of why we want minimal Govt. involvement

Post by Moe Gibbs » Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:57 pm

Imagine a world where you could drive fast enough during your morning commute to get a speeding ticket..!
How about a world where one crazy dude who is flashing a sword on a downtown sidewalk is no longer able to create a massive domino effect that shuts down traffic throughout the entire city..?
How about a world where water is so plentiful that we don't need to have laws on the books that make it illegal for home owners to catch and store rain water that falls on their own property..?
How about a world where competition for housing is so lax that apartment complexes have huge vacancy rates and some end up getting torn down in favor of single family homes on acreage...? How about a world where you don't need to make reservations a year in advance just to stay in Yosemite...?
Our quality of life has suffered greatly since the population doubled during the past 60 years. Those who were born into our overpopulated mess don't know anything different. They have no point of reference. Being able to look out the window of your house that sits on a tiny "postage stamp lot" and see what your neighbors are eating for dinner seems natural to those who don't know any better.

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 79052
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Perfect example of why we want minimal Govt. involvement

Post by D-train » Sun Feb 23, 2020 7:37 pm

For those of you on Twitter, James Woods is a must follow:
James Woods
@RealJamesWoods
The election of #AOC, #RashidaTlaib, and #IlhanOmar was a perfect storm that destroyed the Democratic Party. Nancy Pelosi rolled over for them like a two dollar hooker, and the Democrats are now stuck with a commie curmudgeon screaming at billionaire boogeymen under his bed.
dt

User avatar
Moe Gibbs
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:26 pm

Re: Perfect example of why we want minimal Govt. involvement

Post by Moe Gibbs » Sun Feb 23, 2020 10:39 pm

Aubrey Huff is another guy who dares to be outspoken. He was openly critical of the Giant's decision to hire a female trainer. The Liberal Media seems to be hiding the exact tweet[s] in question, so I don't know what Huff actually said. Huff is also openly in favor of President Trump.
The result is that SFG has a 10 year reunion for their WS Heroes planned and Huff was told he is not welcome.

DanielVogelbach
Posts: 1263
Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:43 pm

Re: Perfect example of why we want minimal Govt. involvement

Post by DanielVogelbach » Mon Feb 24, 2020 3:47 pm

Moe Gibbs wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:57 pm
Imagine a world where you could drive fast enough during your morning commute to get a speeding ticket..!
How about a world where one crazy dude who is flashing a sword on a downtown sidewalk is no longer able to create a massive domino effect that shuts down traffic throughout the entire city..?
How about a world where water is so plentiful that we don't need to have laws on the books that make it illegal for home owners to catch and store rain water that falls on their own property..?
How about a world where competition for housing is so lax that apartment complexes have huge vacancy rates and some end up getting torn down in favor of single family homes on acreage...? How about a world where you don't need to make reservations a year in advance just to stay in Yosemite...?
Our quality of life has suffered greatly since the population doubled during the past 60 years. Those who were born into our overpopulated mess don't know anything different. They have no point of reference. Being able to look out the window of your house that sits on a tiny "postage stamp lot" and see what your neighbors are eating for dinner seems natural to those who don't know any better.
"Overpopulation" is a loosely used term that nobody can actually define. It's also confused with urban overcrowding. Many cities are densely populated with traffic jams and long lines, but does that mean there are "too many" people on planet Earth? Of course, not. Another key component is WHY are cities crowded? They're crowded because people are coming from all over to be there, not because they're recklessly reproducing. If fact, you will find fertility rates higher in rural areas.

One thing contributing to the problem is lack of mobility. Some people will prefer the city even with the crowding, because of the proximity to jobs, schools, health care, grocery stores, entertainment, etc. But, there's actually an astounding amount of open space outside of the cities. The problem is that most city dwellers are trapped in the grip of the city. Numbers show less and less people are moving from state to state. There are several reasons for this, and they all have to do with economics, politics, and government.

Still, if you have even a modest amount of resources and you really want to live away from crowds, it's pretty f#cking easy to do. Perhaps you're looking to have your cake and eat it, too. You want to have an 80,0000 person football game and then no crowds or traffic when trying to leave. I will say that I'm right there with ya. I love so much of the city, but the trade-off is the crowding.

And, if you have LOTS of resources, then what could be better than the modern world? You can avoid traffic with a helicopter. You can have a city apartment and a country home. You think someone like Donald Trump or Michael Bloomberg is trying to go back to a 1960s life of luxury?

User avatar
Moe Gibbs
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:26 pm

Re: Perfect example of why we want minimal Govt. involvement

Post by Moe Gibbs » Mon Feb 24, 2020 4:40 pm

DanielVogelbach wrote:
Mon Feb 24, 2020 3:47 pm
Moe Gibbs wrote:
Sun Feb 23, 2020 1:57 pm
Imagine a world where you could drive fast enough during your morning commute to get a speeding ticket..!
How about a world where one crazy dude who is flashing a sword on a downtown sidewalk is no longer able to create a massive domino effect that shuts down traffic throughout the entire city..?
How about a world where water is so plentiful that we don't need to have laws on the books that make it illegal for home owners to catch and store rain water that falls on their own property..?
How about a world where competition for housing is so lax that apartment complexes have huge vacancy rates and some end up getting torn down in favor of single family homes on acreage...? How about a world where you don't need to make reservations a year in advance just to stay in Yosemite...?
Our quality of life has suffered greatly since the population doubled during the past 60 years. Those who were born into our overpopulated mess don't know anything different. They have no point of reference. Being able to look out the window of your house that sits on a tiny "postage stamp lot" and see what your neighbors are eating for dinner seems natural to those who don't know any better.
"Overpopulation" is a loosely used term that nobody can actually define. It's also confused with urban overcrowding. Many cities are densely populated with traffic jams and long lines, but does that mean there are "too many" people on planet Earth? Of course, not. Another key component is WHY are cities crowded? They're crowded because people are coming from all over to be there, not because they're recklessly reproducing. If fact, you will find fertility rates higher in rural areas.

One thing contributing to the problem is lack of mobility. Some people will prefer the city even with the crowding, because of the proximity to jobs, schools, health care, grocery stores, entertainment, etc. But, there's actually an astounding amount of open space outside of the cities. The problem is that most city dwellers are trapped in the grip of the city. Numbers show less and less people are moving from state to state. There are several reasons for this, and they all have to do with economics, politics, and government.

Still, if you have even a modest amount of resources and you really want to live away from crowds, it's pretty f#cking easy to do. Perhaps you're looking to have your cake and eat it, too. You want to have an 80,0000 person football game and then no crowds or traffic when trying to leave. I will say that I'm right there with ya. I love so much of the city, but the trade-off is the crowding.

And, if you have LOTS of resources, then what could be better than the modern world? You can avoid traffic with a helicopter. You can have a city apartment and a country home. You think someone like Donald Trump or Michael Bloomberg is trying to go back to a 1960s life of luxury?

What contributes to the problem are the FUTURE FELON FACTORY WELFARE QUEENS that the poor taxpayers are forced to sponsor. They poop out more babies than they would have any hope of supporting on their own.
Our birth rate IS trending downward and so in 100 years I hope we might be able to return what our population was in the 1950s.
BTW..the "astounding amount of open space" that's left in the USA is mostly harsh, unliveable, hard to develop, or else government land. All the "best kept secret areas" were gobbled up years ago.

Post Reply