They're Billionaires. They obviously don't give a F about negative backlash because they don't have to. I respect that...trharder wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2026 5:37 pmYeah, I follow both of them, but my point is it's a bad idea for them.D-train wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2026 4:18 pmI actually like it. Imagine if John Stanton was on X. LOLtrharder wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2026 3:17 pm
The old man and the son are both active on X, on the Seahawks and interacting with the fans. I think this is probably a bad idea on their part. It's a bad idea for players and therefore seems even dumber for owners. For me, the son is less irritating. But I admit, none of my feelings about the new owners, good or bad, is any indication they will, or won't, fuck up the Seahawks. Change is inevitable.
Regression
Re: Regression
dt
Re: Regression
I absolutely love that Darnold comes back to team with Garrett, McVay and the reigning MVP, prompting ESPN and the nation to crown the Rams before the season even starts. Takes so much pressure off this team in their bid to repeat, adds a huge motivational factor for being overlooked and underrated, and will make things that much sweeter when for the second straight year they hoist the Lombardi on the home field of their biggest rival.Donn Beach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 03, 2026 3:04 amWell hes probably not setting another record. The question really is how disruptive that line will be. I get a lot of Garrett stuff on my feed, his mic'ed up stuff. Hes a funny guy. Im getting to like him. I can see him being a force multiplier kind of teammate which is scary. Id be happy to see him and the Rams have a good season so long as the Seahawks kick their ass, also the 49ers. I think i see it like i did the pac ten, sort of a pride in the division in general. I dont have that sort of atittude towards the AL West. The Padres and Rangers can go screw themselves
A feat to be finished in Glitz town that not even Hollywood could script.
-
Donn Beach
- Posts: 20865
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Regression
What you want is that same situation with the showdown at the end of the season like last year. The league obviously has tried to schedule for that. Win or lose that's what to look forward to. It be disappointing if it doesn't develop that way.
-
Donn Beach
- Posts: 20865
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Regression
Charbonnet update,
Macdonald said, "Zach's doing awesome. He has a certain timetable in his mind, which we won't divulge right now, (but) he has a certain timetable that he's targeting, and he's on target for that timetable, which is great. It's an aggressive timetable from if you just kind of put the whole thing into perspective, I think that shows what type of guy he is...He looks pretty dang good."
-
Donn Beach
- Posts: 20865
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Regression
So the 49ers lose a defensive tackle for the season, Alfred Collins. Thought he was depth but I'm seeing him referred to as a starter
- Sibelius Hindemith
- Posts: 16541
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Regression
He sounded like a really nice person at the press conference and in the interview (he was on KJR yesterday).trharder wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2026 3:17 pmThe old man and the son are both active on X, on the Seahawks and interacting with the fans. I think this is probably a bad idea on their part. It's a bad idea for players and therefore seems even dumber for owners. For me, the son is less irritating. But I admit, none of my feelings about the new owners, good or bad, is any indication they will, or won't, fuck up the Seahawks. Change is inevitable.
-
Captain 97
- Posts: 3919
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm
Re: Regression
Seems as if the reports of the Rams impending domination may have been greatly exaggerated.
-
Michael K.
- Posts: 14683
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am
Re: Regression
Remember when they were destined to go 20 and 0 and Stafford and Darnold could ride off into the sunset with McVey!?Captain 97 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 11, 2026 2:48 amSeems as if the reports of the Rams impending domination may have been greatly exaggerated.
- Sibelius Hindemith
- Posts: 16541
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Regression
The grades are out, and Anfernee got a 3.1 pass block grade vs the Pats. Not 31. Three point one.
Looks like the time he spent at that offensive lineman camp really paid off.
You guys defending him need to just accept that he will never be even a mediocre let alone poor pass blocker. All he's good for is trucking people on run plays. He's one dimensional.
Looks like the time he spent at that offensive lineman camp really paid off.
You guys defending him need to just accept that he will never be even a mediocre let alone poor pass blocker. All he's good for is trucking people on run plays. He's one dimensional.
-
Donn Beach
- Posts: 20865
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Regression
Sibelius Hindemith wrote: ↑Fri Sep 11, 2026 3:50 amThe grades are out, and Anfernee got a 3.1 pass block grade vs the Pats. Not 31. Three point one.![]()
![]()
![]()
Looks like the time he spent at that offensive lineman camp really paid off.![]()
You guys defending him need to just accept that he will never be even a mediocre let alone poor pass blocker. All he's good for is trucking people on run plays. He's one dimensional.
Screenshot_20260910_203838_Chrome.jpg
Seens to beg the question, then why is he playing? Nobody seems to be able take his job. I don't defend Bradford, i don't know a thing about offensive line play, and i don't think much of pff. My opinion is based on MM continuing to play him. I will defend MMs judgment, Anthony Bradford was the starting right guard on a SB winning team. let's see if they bother to make Stephens active. Actually Haynes was, didn't have snap other than STs
It was noted Sunday night football dropped pff rankings from their broadcast. PFF is fine except when it doesn't reflect actual reality. PFFs Bradford ranking doesn't reflect actual reality, which is he's the starting right guard on the team that just won the SB. I'm going with reality
JJ Watt
"The number one issue with PFF by far, bar none, hands down is their player grading system and the fact that they project it everywhere, including nationally televised games on Sunday night where everybody's watching. And they make it underneath the rankings, where it states as fact '91st out of 97th defensive tackles.'… that is a completely made-up number,"