Regression

User avatar
D-train
Posts: 82875
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2019 1:33 am
Location: Quincy, MA

Re: Regression

Post by D-train » Sun Sep 06, 2026 6:33 pm

trharder wrote:
Sun Sep 06, 2026 5:37 pm
D-train wrote:
Sun Sep 06, 2026 4:18 pm
trharder wrote:
Sun Sep 06, 2026 3:17 pm

The old man and the son are both active on X, on the Seahawks and interacting with the fans. I think this is probably a bad idea on their part. It's a bad idea for players and therefore seems even dumber for owners. For me, the son is less irritating. But I admit, none of my feelings about the new owners, good or bad, is any indication they will, or won't, fuck up the Seahawks. Change is inevitable.
I actually like it. Imagine if John Stanton was on X. LOL
Yeah, I follow both of them, but my point is it's a bad idea for them.
They're Billionaires. They obviously don't give a F about negative backlash because they don't have to. I respect that...
dt

57reasons
Posts: 1935
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 4:19 am
Location: 98118

Re: Regression

Post by 57reasons » Mon Sep 07, 2026 5:51 pm

Donn Beach wrote:
Thu Sep 03, 2026 3:04 am
Well hes probably not setting another record. The question really is how disruptive that line will be. I get a lot of Garrett stuff on my feed, his mic'ed up stuff. Hes a funny guy. Im getting to like him. I can see him being a force multiplier kind of teammate which is scary. Id be happy to see him and the Rams have a good season so long as the Seahawks kick their ass, also the 49ers. I think i see it like i did the pac ten, sort of a pride in the division in general. I dont have that sort of atittude towards the AL West. The Padres and Rangers can go screw themselves
I absolutely love that Darnold comes back to team with Garrett, McVay and the reigning MVP, prompting ESPN and the nation to crown the Rams before the season even starts. Takes so much pressure off this team in their bid to repeat, adds a huge motivational factor for being overlooked and underrated, and will make things that much sweeter when for the second straight year they hoist the Lombardi on the home field of their biggest rival.
A feat to be finished in Glitz town that not even Hollywood could script.

Donn Beach
Posts: 20865
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Regression

Post by Donn Beach » Tue Sep 08, 2026 2:20 pm

What you want is that same situation with the showdown at the end of the season like last year. The league obviously has tried to schedule for that. Win or lose that's what to look forward to. It be disappointing if it doesn't develop that way.

Donn Beach
Posts: 20865
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Regression

Post by Donn Beach » Wed Sep 09, 2026 5:47 am

Charbonnet update,
Macdonald said, "Zach's doing awesome. He has a certain timetable in his mind, which we won't divulge right now, (but) he has a certain timetable that he's targeting, and he's on target for that timetable, which is great. It's an aggressive timetable from if you just kind of put the whole thing into perspective, I think that shows what type of guy he is...He looks pretty dang good."

Donn Beach
Posts: 20865
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Regression

Post by Donn Beach » Wed Sep 09, 2026 6:04 am

So the 49ers lose a defensive tackle for the season, Alfred Collins. Thought he was depth but I'm seeing him referred to as a starter

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 16541
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Regression

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Thu Sep 10, 2026 12:19 pm

trharder wrote:
Sun Sep 06, 2026 3:17 pm
Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Fri Sep 04, 2026 8:56 pm
The son has me worried.
The old man and the son are both active on X, on the Seahawks and interacting with the fans. I think this is probably a bad idea on their part. It's a bad idea for players and therefore seems even dumber for owners. For me, the son is less irritating. But I admit, none of my feelings about the new owners, good or bad, is any indication they will, or won't, fuck up the Seahawks. Change is inevitable.
He sounded like a really nice person at the press conference and in the interview (he was on KJR yesterday).

Captain 97
Posts: 3919
Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 9:23 pm

Re: Regression

Post by Captain 97 » Fri Sep 11, 2026 2:48 am

Seems as if the reports of the Rams impending domination may have been greatly exaggerated.

Michael K.
Posts: 14683
Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 5:27 am

Re: Regression

Post by Michael K. » Fri Sep 11, 2026 3:49 am

Captain 97 wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2026 2:48 am
Seems as if the reports of the Rams impending domination may have been greatly exaggerated.
Remember when they were destined to go 20 and 0 and Stafford and Darnold could ride off into the sunset with McVey!?

User avatar
Sibelius Hindemith
Posts: 16541
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 3:09 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Regression

Post by Sibelius Hindemith » Fri Sep 11, 2026 3:50 am

The grades are out, and Anfernee got a 3.1 pass block grade vs the Pats. Not 31. Three point one. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Looks like the time he spent at that offensive lineman camp really paid off. :roll:

You guys defending him need to just accept that he will never be even a mediocre let alone poor pass blocker. All he's good for is trucking people on run plays. He's one dimensional.

Screenshot_20260910_203838_Chrome.jpg

Donn Beach
Posts: 20865
Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am

Re: Regression

Post by Donn Beach » Fri Sep 11, 2026 4:34 am

Sibelius Hindemith wrote:
Fri Sep 11, 2026 3:50 am
The grades are out, and Anfernee got a 3.1 pass block grade vs the Pats. Not 31. Three point one. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Looks like the time he spent at that offensive lineman camp really paid off. :roll:

You guys defending him need to just accept that he will never be even a mediocre let alone poor pass blocker. All he's good for is trucking people on run plays. He's one dimensional.


Screenshot_20260910_203838_Chrome.jpg

Seens to beg the question, then why is he playing? Nobody seems to be able take his job. I don't defend Bradford, i don't know a thing about offensive line play, and i don't think much of pff. My opinion is based on MM continuing to play him. I will defend MMs judgment, Anthony Bradford was the starting right guard on a SB winning team. let's see if they bother to make Stephens active. Actually Haynes was, didn't have snap other than STs

It was noted Sunday night football dropped pff rankings from their broadcast. PFF is fine except when it doesn't reflect actual reality. PFFs Bradford ranking doesn't reflect actual reality, which is he's the starting right guard on the team that just won the SB. I'm going with reality

JJ Watt
"The number one issue with PFF by far, bar none, hands down is their player grading system and the fact that they project it everywhere, including nationally televised games on Sunday night where everybody's watching. And they make it underneath the rankings, where it states as fact '91st out of 97th defensive tackles.'… that is a completely made-up number,"

Post Reply