You want more proof?!!! Here you go!! Because you have NO ARGUMENT!!!!!auroraave wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 3:00 pmSexymarinersfan wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 2:14 pmI NEVER EVER said he was "THEIR GUY!" NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!auroraave wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 2:09 pmCould you please post your 'evidence" where PC/JS said AR was their guy? You assuming and projecting YOUR want is not evidence - it's simply you projecting your desire. I've never seen them suggest Richardson was thier guy, and taking a pre draft meeting with him is not evidence of anything more than doing thier due dilligence. Also, could you please point out where Seattle Addict said Carter was his guy? Your obsesson with Richardson is bizarre to say the least. Read your posts dude, you are literally making stuff up out of thin air. Just like your 1000 posts about how carter was a bad person as a way to justify your personal choice. I haven't seen anyone so completely obsessed with a player - maybe ever - on this board. You go on this unhinged rant - then post some pic suggesting you're winning some argument - which you aren't because you are literally making stuff up. Bizarre.
YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS OBSESSING THAT I DID!!!!!
Blah! Blah! Blah! Just to fit "YOU'RE NARRATIVE!"
My guy has been Will Anderson! #1. Go back and read some posts! Do some research before posting auroraave!!!! Never have I seen a guy make shit up that wasn't real just so he could look correct in a rebuttle. Deluisonal!! I dare you to try and find a post where I said that. I'll wager you a grand right now!!! Put you're money where you're mouth is.
I always felt that Richardson would be the "THE PICK" if there, but my hope had been that Will Anderson if on the board was our #1 choice. THAT was my guy! Richardson was always my back up option. If you only read an ⅛ of the posts then you're not getting all the information now are you?! You can't just make shit up unless you provide all the facts.
Fact: Schneider said that they liked a couple of QB's in this draft. Who were they, and where did they have them ranked? Who knows?!
FACT: Did I like the the QB's in this draft? Hell yes!! I thought the Hawks should grab one if AVAILABLE. I NEVER SUGGESTED trading up...once!!!!!
FACT: Will Anderson was #1 on my big board!! Over every single player in the draft!!!
Now where's you're evidence?!!! Oh that's right! You don't have any because you just make random shit up as you go!
![]()
Dude, you are unhinged.
Current 2023 Depth Chart
- Sexymarinersfan
- Posts: 9090
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 11:34 pm
- Location: Ft. Worth Texas
- Contact:
Re: Current 2023 Depth Chart
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot_20230501_100001_Chrome.jpg (347.76 KiB) Viewed 285 times
- Sexymarinersfan
- Posts: 9090
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 11:34 pm
- Location: Ft. Worth Texas
- Contact:
Re: Current 2023 Depth Chart
The ONE THING Seattleaddict and I agreed on consistently at the top of the draft was that IF Will Anderson was on the board at 5, he would worthy of that pick!
- Cascade Kid
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 2:11 am
Re: Current 2023 Depth Chart
That is a BS request if I ever saw one.auroraave wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 2:09 pmCould you please post your 'evidence" where PC/JS said AR was their guy? You assuming and projecting YOUR want is not evidence - it's simply you projecting your desire. I've never seen them suggest Richardson was thier guy, and taking a pre draft meeting with him is not evidence of anything more than doing thier due dilligence. Also, could you please point out where Seattle Addict said Carter was his guy? Your obsesson with Richardson is bizarre to say the least. Read your posts dude, you are literally making stuff up out of thin air. Just like your 1000 posts about how carter was a bad person as a way to justify your personal choice. I haven't seen anyone so completely obsessed with a player - maybe ever - on this board. You go on this unhinged rant - then post some pic suggesting you're winning some argument - which you aren't because you are literally making stuff up. Bizarre.
PC/JS isn't going to discuss any player they like in the draft as a potential pick or proclaim guy X is "there guy". Nor would they do this post draft about any player drafted by another team.
The Hawks interviewed at least 5 QBs and 4 of them were 1st round projections. Obviously Levis was not "there guy". This leaves Young, Stroud, and Richardson. From there you can speculate who the 'two QBs of interest' are if they were interested in two. But nevertheless, they were certainly very interested in taking QB at #5.
Re: Current 2023 Depth Chart
I missed him saying that. I think if you post that link or quote it would be helpful. Thanks.Sexymarinersfan wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 2:05 amSchneider said there were 2 QB's that they liked. It sure as hell wasn't Will Levis. And we all know they had no shot at Bryce Young, so that leaves Richardson and Stroud. I think that they would have taken Richardson or Anderson over Witherspoon. But if they had BOTH been on the board, then my guess is that they would've taken Anderson. I'm curious to what their value board looked like for the Top 5.Sibelius Hindemith wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 1:35 amWhy do you say that? Didn't Carroll say there were only two players they considered worth taking at 5? I assume the other was Will Anderson.Sexymarinersfan wrote: ↑Sun Apr 30, 2023 7:48 pm- Irsay quoted that he called AR about 3 hours before the draft and asked him if anyone else was calling him or interested. AR said one other team was, but they hadn’t called him that day yet. Safe to say it was Seattle.
dt
Re: Current 2023 Depth Chart
Are you referring to the selfie tour?Cascade Kid wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 3:12 pmThat is a BS request if I ever saw one.auroraave wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 2:09 pmCould you please post your 'evidence" where PC/JS said AR was their guy? You assuming and projecting YOUR want is not evidence - it's simply you projecting your desire. I've never seen them suggest Richardson was thier guy, and taking a pre draft meeting with him is not evidence of anything more than doing thier due dilligence. Also, could you please point out where Seattle Addict said Carter was his guy? Your obsesson with Richardson is bizarre to say the least. Read your posts dude, you are literally making stuff up out of thin air. Just like your 1000 posts about how carter was a bad person as a way to justify your personal choice. I haven't seen anyone so completely obsessed with a player - maybe ever - on this board. You go on this unhinged rant - then post some pic suggesting you're winning some argument - which you aren't because you are literally making stuff up. Bizarre.
PC/JS isn't going to discuss any player they like in the draft as a potential pick or proclaim guy X is "there guy". Nor would they do this post draft about any player drafted by another team.
The Hawks interviewed at least 5 QBs and 4 of them were 1st round projections. Obviously Levis was not "there guy". This leaves Young, Stroud, and Richardson. From there you can speculate who the 'two QBs of interest' are if they were interested in two. But nevertheless, they were certainly very interested in taking QB at #5.
dt
- Sexymarinersfan
- Posts: 9090
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 11:34 pm
- Location: Ft. Worth Texas
- Contact:
Re: Current 2023 Depth Chart
Ok, I promise you I will find it. It will help settle this all down. I'm headed to bed. But once I get to work tonight I will start digging. I wouldn't make something random like that up. I just found very intriguing, like..."ok, so who were they?!"D-train wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 3:15 pmI missed him saying that. I think if you post that link or quote it would be helpful. Thanks.Sexymarinersfan wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 2:05 amSchneider said there were 2 QB's that they liked. It sure as hell wasn't Will Levis. And we all know they had no shot at Bryce Young, so that leaves Richardson and Stroud. I think that they would have taken Richardson or Anderson over Witherspoon. But if they had BOTH been on the board, then my guess is that they would've taken Anderson. I'm curious to what their value board looked like for the Top 5.Sibelius Hindemith wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 1:35 am
Why do you say that? Didn't Carroll say there were only two players they considered worth taking at 5? I assume the other was Will Anderson.
- Sexymarinersfan
- Posts: 9090
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 11:34 pm
- Location: Ft. Worth Texas
- Contact:
Re: Current 2023 Depth Chart
I'm almost positive it was when they were interviewed after one of the pressers. It mightve been day 3, because of the fact they didn't come out with a single QB in the draft. And one if the media guys was on that question!D-train wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 3:17 pmAre you referring to the selfie tour?Cascade Kid wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 3:12 pmThat is a BS request if I ever saw one.auroraave wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 2:09 pmCould you please post your 'evidence" where PC/JS said AR was their guy? You assuming and projecting YOUR want is not evidence - it's simply you projecting your desire. I've never seen them suggest Richardson was thier guy, and taking a pre draft meeting with him is not evidence of anything more than doing thier due dilligence. Also, could you please point out where Seattle Addict said Carter was his guy? Your obsesson with Richardson is bizarre to say the least. Read your posts dude, you are literally making stuff up out of thin air. Just like your 1000 posts about how carter was a bad person as a way to justify your personal choice. I haven't seen anyone so completely obsessed with a player - maybe ever - on this board. You go on this unhinged rant - then post some pic suggesting you're winning some argument - which you aren't because you are literally making stuff up. Bizarre.
PC/JS isn't going to discuss any player they like in the draft as a potential pick or proclaim guy X is "there guy". Nor would they do this post draft about any player drafted by another team.
The Hawks interviewed at least 5 QBs and 4 of them were 1st round projections. Obviously Levis was not "there guy". This leaves Young, Stroud, and Richardson. From there you can speculate who the 'two QBs of interest' are if they were interested in two. But nevertheless, they were certainly very interested in taking QB at #5.
- Cascade Kid
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 2:11 am
Re: Current 2023 Depth Chart
Yes, the selfie tour. Which included team/player interviewsD-train wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 3:17 pmAre you referring to the selfie tour?Cascade Kid wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 3:12 pmThat is a BS request if I ever saw one.auroraave wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 2:09 pmCould you please post your 'evidence" where PC/JS said AR was their guy? You assuming and projecting YOUR want is not evidence - it's simply you projecting your desire. I've never seen them suggest Richardson was thier guy, and taking a pre draft meeting with him is not evidence of anything more than doing thier due dilligence. Also, could you please point out where Seattle Addict said Carter was his guy? Your obsesson with Richardson is bizarre to say the least. Read your posts dude, you are literally making stuff up out of thin air. Just like your 1000 posts about how carter was a bad person as a way to justify your personal choice. I haven't seen anyone so completely obsessed with a player - maybe ever - on this board. You go on this unhinged rant - then post some pic suggesting you're winning some argument - which you aren't because you are literally making stuff up. Bizarre.
PC/JS isn't going to discuss any player they like in the draft as a potential pick or proclaim guy X is "there guy". Nor would they do this post draft about any player drafted by another team.
The Hawks interviewed at least 5 QBs and 4 of them were 1st round projections. Obviously Levis was not "there guy". This leaves Young, Stroud, and Richardson. From there you can speculate who the 'two QBs of interest' are if they were interested in two. But nevertheless, they were certainly very interested in taking QB at #5.
- Cascade Kid
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2021 2:11 am
Re: Current 2023 Depth Chart
I felt during the 'selfie tour' that the Hawks were not interested in Levis at all even before his Pro Day visit. First and most importantly, Shane Waldron did not attend the pro day for Levis. Second was not so important, but when you see JS' photo in Levis' selfie JS wasn't taking it serious at all compared to the other three selfies. Levis' selfie was the "smoke screen" to dilute possible interest within the other three QBs.D-train wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 3:17 pmAre you referring to the selfie tour?Cascade Kid wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 3:12 pmThat is a BS request if I ever saw one.auroraave wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 2:09 pmCould you please post your 'evidence" where PC/JS said AR was their guy? You assuming and projecting YOUR want is not evidence - it's simply you projecting your desire. I've never seen them suggest Richardson was thier guy, and taking a pre draft meeting with him is not evidence of anything more than doing thier due dilligence. Also, could you please point out where Seattle Addict said Carter was his guy? Your obsesson with Richardson is bizarre to say the least. Read your posts dude, you are literally making stuff up out of thin air. Just like your 1000 posts about how carter was a bad person as a way to justify your personal choice. I haven't seen anyone so completely obsessed with a player - maybe ever - on this board. You go on this unhinged rant - then post some pic suggesting you're winning some argument - which you aren't because you are literally making stuff up. Bizarre.
PC/JS isn't going to discuss any player they like in the draft as a potential pick or proclaim guy X is "there guy". Nor would they do this post draft about any player drafted by another team.
The Hawks interviewed at least 5 QBs and 4 of them were 1st round projections. Obviously Levis was not "there guy". This leaves Young, Stroud, and Richardson. From there you can speculate who the 'two QBs of interest' are if they were interested in two. But nevertheless, they were certainly very interested in taking QB at #5.
-
Donn Beach
- Posts: 20791
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2019 1:06 am
Re: Current 2023 Depth Chart
I was curious where he said it as well, but saying you were interested in a couple of qbs is still a long way from actually pulling the trigger on one. And after their selfie tour they would be committed in saying it or the entire thing looks like bs